Paper · 2011 · Zhongguo Nongye Daxue xuebao

Harvest index and residue factor of cereal crops in China

Huimin Xie

14
claims
14
verbatim quotes
73
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Harvest index(HI) and residue factor(RF) are of essentially significance for crop production research and crop residue quantity assessment.HI and RF of non-cereal crops in their main production provinces of China are reviewed according to field data collected from original papers published mainly during 2006-2010.HI of soybean varied between 0.35 and 0.47 whereas RF between 1.13 and1.86 across six provinces,and the average was 0.42 and 1.50,respectively.Tubers including potato,sweet potato,and cassava had HI between 0.55 and 0.77 whereas their between 0.30 and 1.17 across eleven provinces.The average HI and RF was 0.59 and 0.71 for potato,0.69 and 0.45 for sweet potato,and 0.64 and 0.50 for cassava,respectively.The average HI and RF for cotton were 0.15 and 2.91,with a range of 0.12-0.18 and 2.41-4.09 respectively.Peanut had HI between 0.41-0.54 and RF between 0.85-1.43 across six provinces,and the average was 0.50 and 1.14,respectively.Canola had HI 0.24-0.28 and RF 2.57-3.17 across six provinces,and the average HI and RF were and 2.87,respectively.Sunflower had HI between 0.21 and 0.40 whereas RF between 1.50 and 3.76 across four provinces in Northwest and North China,and their average HI and RF were 0.32 and 2.63 respectively.In Henan and Hubei provinces,the average HI and RF were 0.34 and 2.01 for sesame.Sugarbeet had a higher average HI 0.71 with a range of 0.60-0.85,its RF varied between 0.18-0.67,with an average of 0.43.HI and RF of sugarcane was 0.70 and 0.43 for Fujian province only.Tobacco had HI between 0.52-0.67 and RF between 0.49-0.92 across seven provinces,the average HI and RF was 0.61 and 0.71,respectively.In near future,there will be a potential trend to decrease the HI to approach higher crop residue yields,along with substantial improvement of the economic product yield due to increase in biomass yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean in six Chinese provinces had an average harvest index of 0.42 and residue factor of 1.50 (HI 0.35-0.47, RF 1.13-1.86).

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
HIe0
Value
0.42 and 1.50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HI of soybean varied between 0.35 and 0.47 whereas RF between 1.13 and1.86 across six provinces,and the average was 0.42 and 1.50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–444 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Potato had an average HI of 0.59 and RF of 0.71.

Outcome
HI and RFe0
Value
0.59 and 0.71e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average HI and RF was 0.59 and 0.71 for potato,0.69 and 0.45 for sweet potato,and 0.64 and 0.50 for cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–707 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet potato had an average HI of 0.69 and RF of 0.45.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Outcome
HI and RFe0
Value
0.69 and 0.45e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average HI and RF was 0.59 and 0.71 for potato,0.69 and 0.45 for sweet potato,and 0.64 and 0.50 for cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–707 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava had an average HI of 0.64 and RF of 0.50.

Outcome
HI and RFe0
Value
0.64 and 0.50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average HI and RF was 0.59 and 0.71 for potato,0.69 and 0.45 for sweet potato,and 0.64 and 0.50 for cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–707 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton had an average HI of 0.15 and RF of 2.91, with ranges 0.12-0.18 and 2.41-4.09.

Outcome
HI and RFe0
Value
0.15 and 2.91e0
Qualifier
range of 0.12-0.18 and 2.41-4.09e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average HI and RF for cotton were 0.15 and 2.91,with a range of 0.12-0.18 and 2.41-4.09 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–825 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut across six provinces had an average HI of 0.50 and RF of 1.14 (HI 0.41-0.54, RF 0.85-1.43).

Outcome
HIe0
Value
0.50 and 1.14e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peanut had HI between 0.41-0.54 and RF between 0.85-1.43 across six provinces,and the average was 0.50 and 1.14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–937 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Canola across six provinces had HI of 0.24-0.28 and RF of 2.57-3.17.

Outcome
HIe0
Value
0.24-0.28 and RF 2.57-3.17e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Canola had HI 0.24-0.28 and RF 2.57-3.17 across six provinces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1012 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower in Northwest and North China had an average HI of 0.32 and RF of 2.63.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome
HI and RFe0
Value
0.32 and 2.63e0
Setting
Northwest and North Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sunflower had HI between 0.21 and 0.40 whereas RF between 1.50 and 3.76 across four provinces in Northwest and North China,and their average HI and RF were 0.32 and 2.63”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1235 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame in Henan and Hubei provinces had an average HI of 0.34 and RF of 2.01.

Outcome
HI and RFe0
Value
0.34 and 2.01e0
Setting
Henan and Hubei provincese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Henan and Hubei provinces,the average HI and RF were 0.34 and 2.01 for sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1329 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarbeet had an average HI of 0.71, range 0.60-0.85.

Outcome
average HIe0
Value
0.71e0
Qualifier
range of 0.60-0.85e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarbeet had a higher average HI 0.71 with a range of 0.60-0.85,its RF varied between 0.18-0.67,with an average of 0.43”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarbeet had an average RF of 0.43, range 0.18-0.67.

Outcome
RFe0
Value
0.43e0
Qualifier
0.18-0.67e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugarbeet had a higher average HI 0.71 with a range of 0.60-0.85,its RF varied between 0.18-0.67,with an average of 0.43”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane in Fujian province only had HI of 0.70 and RF of 0.43.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
HI and RFe0
Value
0.70 and 0.43e0
Setting
Fujian provincee0

Verbatim

e0

“HI and RF of sugarcane was 0.70 and 0.43 for Fujian province only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1516 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco across seven provinces had an average HI of 0.61 and RF of 0.71 (HI 0.52-0.67, RF 0.49-0.92).

Outcome
HI and RFe0
Value
0.61 and 0.71e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tobacco had HI between 0.52-0.67 and RF between 0.49-0.92 across seven provinces,the average HI and RF was 0.61 and 0.71”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1637 · show in text ↑
Observationhypothesisreview summaryprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The authors expect a potential trend to decrease harvest index to obtain higher crop residue yields in the near future.

Taxon
crope0
Outcome
HIe0
Direction
decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“In near future,there will be a potential trend to decrease the HI to approach higher crop residue yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1755 · show in text ↑