Paper · 2002 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Study on growth situation, photosynthetic characteristics and nutrient absorption characteristics of grafted cucumber seedlings

Sun Yan

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this experiment, the four typs of grafted cucumber seedlings were obtained through with black seed pumpkin (Cuarbita ficifolia) and squash (Cucurbita pepo L ) as two rootstocks and with Jin You No 1 and Nong Cheng No 4 as two Scions The growth situation, photosynthetic characteristic and nutrient absorption characteristic of grafted cucumber seedlings and two auto root seedlings were studied The results showed that, comparing the grafted cucumber seedlings with auto root seedlings, the former demonstrated apparent advantages, which were as follows: the root fresh weight of grafted cucumber seedlings was heavier than that of auto root seedlings, the length of the longest side root longer, the development status of roots was better; the ratio of root to shoot was larger, the index of high quality seedlings was higher, the grafted seedlings was very robust; the chlorophyll content of leaves was higher, and the photosynthetic rate (Pn) was greater and the absorbing ability to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium was more powerful

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted cucumber seedlings had heavier roots, longer lateral roots and better root development than own-root seedlings.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
grafted cucumber seedlingse0
Outcome
root fresh weight of grafted cucumber seedlings was heavier than that of auto root seedlings, the length of the longest side root longer, the development status of roots was bettere0
Direction
heaviere0
Comparator
auto root seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“comparing the grafted cucumber seedlings with auto root seedlings, the former demonstrated apparent advantages, which were as follows: the root fresh weight of grafted cucumber seedlings was heavier than that of auto root seedlings, the length of the longest side root longer, the development status of roots was better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted seedlings had larger root-to-shoot ratio and higher seedling quality index and were more robust.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativust0
Treatment
grafted cucumber seedlingse1
Outcome
ratio of root to shoot was larger, the index of high quality seedlings was higher, the grafted seedlings was very robuste0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
auto root seedlingse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“the ratio of root to shoot was larger, the index of high quality seedlings was higher, the grafted seedlings was very robust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–872 · show in text ↑
e1

“comparing the grafted cucumber seedlings with auto root seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted cucumber seedlings had higher leaf chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate than own-root seedlings.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativust0
Treatment
grafted cucumber seedlingse0
Outcome
chlorophyll content of leaves was higher, and the photosynthetic rate (Pn) was greatere1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
auto root seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“comparing the grafted cucumber seedlings with auto root seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“the chlorophyll content of leaves was higher, and the photosynthetic rate (Pn) was greater”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted cucumber seedlings absorbed nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium more strongly than own-root seedlings.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativust0
Treatment
grafted cucumber seedlingse0
Outcome
absorbing ability to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassiume1
Direction
more powerfule1
Comparator
auto root seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“comparing the grafted cucumber seedlings with auto root seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“the absorbing ability to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium was more powerful”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1046 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: general · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

grafting · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

grafting · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 55 positive, 4 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.