Paper · 2009 · Shandi Nongye Shengwu xuebao

Investigation on the fungal infection and its beneficial effects of Arbuscular mycorrhizal tobacco seedlings after transplanting

Yuan Ling

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal(AM) tobacco seedlings were obtained by floating tray technique.Fungal colonization,plant biomass and nutrition status of tobacco seedlings that inoculated AM fungi ever before(BT) or just at the transplantation(JT) were investigated in the present work.Compared with the AM-free or JT seedlings,better nutrient status and higher biomass were investigated.Furthermore,higher infection rate,earlier hyphal development and more perfect mycorrhizal inner-structure in root cells were also observed.As a result,a slow growth period after the transplantation was obtained in BT seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier AM inoculation improved tobacco seedling nutrient status relative to AM-free or transplantation inoculation.

Taxon
tobacco seedlingsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
inoculated AM fungi ever before(BT)e1
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
Outcome
better nutrient statuse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
AM-free or JT seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the AM-free or JT seedlings,better nutrient status and higher biomass were investigated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–378 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculated AM fungi ever before(BT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–202 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier AM inoculation increased tobacco seedling biomass relative to AM-free or transplantation inoculation.

Taxon
tobacco seedlingsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
inoculated AM fungi ever before(BT)e1
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
AM-free or JT seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the AM-free or JT seedlings,better nutrient status and higher biomass were investigated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–378 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculated AM fungi ever before(BT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–202 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier AM inoculation produced higher root colonization, earlier hyphal development, and more developed mycorrhizal structure.

Taxon
tobacco seedlingsNicotiana tabacumt0
Organ / stage
root cellse0
Treatment
inoculated AM fungi ever before(BT)e1
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
Outcome
infection rate,earlier hyphal development and more perfect mycorrhizal inner-structuree0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher infection rate,earlier hyphal development and more perfect mycorrhizal inner-structure in root cells were also observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–516 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculated AM fungi ever before(BT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–202 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier inoculated tobacco seedlings had a slow growth period after transplantation.

Taxon
tobacco seedlingsNicotiana tabacumt0
Material
BT seedlingse0
Outcome
slow growth periode0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a slow growth period after the transplantation was obtained in BT seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–604 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–108 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Glomeromycota · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.