Paper · 2013

Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Photosynthetic Characteristics in Leaves of Flue-cured Tobacco

Yao Jua

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of AM fungi on agronomic attribute,dry matter accumulation,gas exchange parameters,chlorophyll,chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of flue-cured tobacco were studied by pot experiments in order to investigate the tobacco growth effect of the AM fungi inoculation.The results showed that AM fungi inoculation increased significantly tobacco biomass.The agronomic attributes in various growth stages and root cap ratio effects varied with types of AM fungi.Inoculation of AM fungi resulted in increase of net photosynthetic rate,stomatal conductance,transpiration rate,chlorophyll a/b value,the maximum quantum yield of PSII,relative maximal electron transport rate and onset of light saturation in leaves,but the intercellular CO2 concentration and stomatal limitation value did not change significantly.There were differences between different AM Fungi on the total chlorophyll content,carotenoid content,chlorophyll a content,chlorophyll b content and the PS II potential activity in tobacco leaves,but the initial slope was lower than in non-AM plants.The results demonstrated that inoculation of AM fungi might enhance the PSII reaction centers in leaves,which caused photosynthetic organization in leaves were more tolerant to strong light and more conducive to photosynthesis,but the effects of AM fungi promoted the growth of flue-cured tobacco varied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi significantly increased tobacco biomass.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
AM fungi inoculatione0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
tobacco biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“AM fungi inoculation increased significantly tobacco biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic attributes and root cap ratio responses varied by AM fungal type.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
root cap ratio effectse0

Verbatim

e0

“The agronomic attributes in various growth stages and root cap ratio effects varied with types of AM fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi increased net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
Inoculation of AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate,stomatal conductance,transpiration ratee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of AM fungi resulted in increase of net photosynthetic rate,stomatal conductance,transpiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–578 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi increased chlorophyll a/b value, maximum PSII quantum yield and relative maximal electron transport rate.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
Inoculation of AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll a/b value,the maximum quantum yield of PSII,relative maximal electron transport ratee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of AM fungi resulted in increase of net photosynthetic rate,stomatal conductance,transpiration rate,chlorophyll a/b value,the maximum quantum yield of PSII,relative maximal electron transport rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungi increased onset of light saturation.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
Inoculation of AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
onset of light saturatione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of AM fungi resulted in increase of net photosynthetic rate,stomatal conductance,transpiration rate,chlorophyll a/b value,the maximum quantum yield of PSII,relative maximal electron transport rate and onset of light saturation in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercellular CO2 concentration and stomatal limitation did not change significantly with AM fungi.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Outcome
intercellular CO2 concentration and stomatal limitation valuee0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but the intercellular CO2 concentration and stomatal limitation value did not change significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll, carotenoid, chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contents differed among AM fungi.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Interactor
AM FungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
total chlorophyll content,carotenoid content,chlorophyll a content,chlorophyll b contente0

Verbatim

e0

“There were differences between different AM Fungi on the total chlorophyll content,carotenoid content,chlorophyll a content,chlorophyll b content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSII potential activity differed among AM fungi.

Interactor
AM FungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
PS II potential activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were differences between different AM Fungi on the total chlorophyll content,carotenoid content,chlorophyll a content,chlorophyll b content and the PS II potential activity in tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The initial slope was lower in inoculated than non-AM plants.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Outcome
initial slopee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
non-AM plantse0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“but the initial slope was lower than in non-AM plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer AM fungi may enhance leaf PSII reaction centers.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Treatment
inoculation of AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
PSII reaction centerse0
Direction
enhancee0

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation of AM fungi might enhance the PSII reaction centers in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer greater tolerance to strong light.

Taxon
Flue-cured Tobaccot0
Outcome
more tolerant to strong lighte0
Qualifier
photosynthetic organization in leavese0

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic organization in leaves were more tolerant to strong light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–105 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer AM fungi promote tobacco growth to varying degrees.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
growth of flue-cured tobaccoe0

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of AM fungi promoted the growth of flue-cured tobacco varied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1369 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Glomeromycota · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.