Paper · 2014 · Guangdong nongye kexue

Screening and biological control effect of two antagonistic bacteria against banana fusarium wilt

Dai Qing-don

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

A field plot experiment was conducted to test the effects of application Bacillus subtilis BLG01 and BDF11screened from antagonistic Bacillus strains and liquid organic fertilizer(LOF) on the growth of banana plant, disease severity index(DSI) of fusarium wilt, survival ability of FOC and cultivable bacteria population in rhizosphere of banana. Indoor testing showed that BLG01 and BDF11 restrained the mycelial growth of FOC by 70.4% and 77.2% on PDA plate. The results of field experiment showed that, after 100 days of transplanting, all treatments could increase the growth of banana and control efficiencies compared to control treatment. B. subtilis BLG01, BDF11 and LOF together had the biggest control efficiency on banana fusarium wilt. In the optimum treatment, the plant height, stem thickness, fresh weight of aerial and underground part of banana significantly increased, combined DSI decreased by 45.39%-65.87%, the number of FOC decreased significantly by 40.5%-50.1%%, while the number of bacteria in rhizosphere increased significantly by 25.8%-32.8%. The number of FOC was significantly negatively correlated to cultured bacteria in rhizosphere, while was significantly positively correlated to DSI. The results indicate that applying B. subtilis BLG01 and BDF11 with LOF can effectively promote the growth of banana, decrease the number of FOC and improve cultivable bacteria population at rhizosphere of banana, and increase the control effect on banana fusarium wilt, and it shows wide application prospect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BLG01 inhibited FOC mycelial growth by 70.4% on PDA.

Treatment
BLG01e0
Interactor
FOCe0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growth of FOCe0
Direction
restrainede0
Value
70.4%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“BLG01 and BDF11 restrained the mycelial growth of FOC by 70.4% and 77.2% on PDA plate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BDF11 inhibited FOC mycelial growth by 77.2% on PDA.

Treatment
BDF11e0
Interactor
FOCe0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growth of FOCe0
Direction
restrainede0
Value
77.2%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“BLG01 and BDF11 restrained the mycelial growth of FOC by 70.4% and 77.2% on PDA plate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All field treatments increased banana growth relative to control after 100 days.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
growth of bananae0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“after 100 days of transplanting, all treatments could increase the growth of banana and control efficiencies compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All field treatments increased banana wilt control efficiency relative to control after 100 days.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
control efficienciese0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“after 100 days of transplanting, all treatments could increase the growth of banana and control efficiencies compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined BLG01, BDF11, and LOF had the greatest banana fusarium wilt control efficiency.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
B. subtilis BLG01, BDF11 and LOF togethere0
Outcome
control efficiency on banana fusarium wilte0
Direction
biggeste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis BLG01, BDF11 and LOF together had the biggest control efficiency on banana fusarium wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum treatment significantly increased banana height, stem thickness, and above- and belowground fresh weight.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
optimum treatmente0
Outcome
plant height, stem thickness, fresh weight of aerial and underground parte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the optimum treatment, the plant height, stem thickness, fresh weight of aerial and underground part of banana significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum treatment decreased banana disease severity index by 45.39%-65.87%.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
optimum treatmente0
Outcome
DSIe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
45.39%-65.87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the optimum treatment, the plant height, stem thickness, fresh weight of aerial and underground part of banana significantly increased, combined DSI decreased by 45.39%-65.87%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum treatment significantly decreased FOC abundance by 40.5%-50.1%%.

Interactor
FOCe0pathogen
Outcome
number of FOCe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
40.5%-50.1%%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the number of FOC decreased significantly by 40.5%-50.1%%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum treatment significantly increased rhizosphere cultivable bacteria by 25.8%-32.8%.

Outcome
number of bacteria in rhizospheree0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25.8%-32.8%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the number of bacteria in rhizosphere increased significantly by 25.8%-32.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1069 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FOC abundance was significantly negatively correlated with cultivable rhizosphere bacteria.

Interactor
FOCe0pathogen
Outcome
number of FOCe0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Qualifier
cultured bacteria in rhizospheree0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The number of FOC was significantly negatively correlated to cultured bacteria in rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1164 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FOC abundance was significantly positively correlated with banana disease severity index.

Interactor
FOCe0pathogen
Outcome
DSIe0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The number of FOC was significantly negatively correlated to cultured bacteria in rhizosphere, while was significantly positively correlated to DSI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1218 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · disease · MusaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · disease · MusaResults agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.