Paper · 2010 · Anhui nongye kexue

Optimum Planting Density of Hybrid Insect-Resistant Cotton in Cotton Areas along the Yangtze River for High Yield and Quality

Daoqing Xu

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] To observe cotton growth,cotton boll and production at different planting densities and to provide a theoretical reference for reasonable planting density and high-quality high yield cotton along the Yangtze River.[Method] The cotton variety Xiangzamian 8 was used,and its initial density was 12 000 plants/hm2.Density gradient was 9 000 plants/hm2 to set up six treatments.The growth cycle,yield,cotton boll,and characteristics of cotton fiber were observed.[Result] Density did not have significant effect on plant height and growth cycle of cotton.Seed cotton lint percentage and fiber quality were not significantly different between treatments of different densities.However,boll weight,distribution of three-boll,boll abscission rate,stiff and rot boll,and yield were affected significantly.The boll weight and bolls of July 21 decreased with the increase of planting density.The boll abscission rate and percentage of stiff and rot boll increased with the increase of planting density.In addition,the treatment 5 was the worst.The lint yield was highest in the treatment 3 and lowest in the treatment 1,and it was higher in the treatment 2,3 and 4.[Conclusion] The optimum planting density of hybrid insect-resistant cotton is 30 000 plants/hm2 in cotton areas along the Yangtze River.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height did not differ significantly across density treatments.

Treatment
Densitye0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
did not have significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Density did not have significant effect on plant height and growth cycle of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton growth cycle did not differ significantly across density treatments.

Treatment
Densitye0
Outcome
growth cyclee0
Direction
did not have significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Density did not have significant effect on plant height and growth cycle of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton lint percentage and fiber quality did not differ significantly across densities.

Treatment
different densitiese0
Outcome
Seed cotton lint percentage and fiber qualitye0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
treatments of different densitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed cotton lint percentage and fiber quality were not significantly different between treatments of different densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect-Resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boll weight and July 21 bolls decreased as planting density increased.

Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
boll weight and bolls of July 21e0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The boll weight and bolls of July 21 decreased with the increase of planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect-Resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boll abscission rate and stiff and rot boll percentage increased with density.

Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
boll abscission rate and percentage of stiff and rot bolle0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The boll abscission rate and percentage of stiff and rot boll increased with the increase of planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect-Resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 5 performed worst.

Treatment
treatment 5e0
Outcome
the worste0
Direction
the worste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment 5 was the worst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect-Resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lint yield was highest in treatment 3.

Treatment
treatment 3e0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lint yield was highest in the treatment 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect-Resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lint yield was lowest in treatment 1.

Treatment
treatment 1e0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lint yield was highest in the treatment 3 and lowest in the treatment 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect-Resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments 2, 3 and 4 had higher lint yield.

Treatment
treatment 2,3 and 4e0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lint yield was highest in the treatment 3 and lowest in the treatment 1,and it was higher in the treatment 2,3 and 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hybrid Insect-Resistant Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–58 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a planting density of 30 000 plants/hm2 along the Yangtze River.

Outcome
optimum planting densitye0
Value
30 000 plants/hm2e0
Setting
Yangtze Rivere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum planting density of hybrid insect-resistant cotton is 30 000 plants/hm2 in cotton areas along the Yangtze River”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1303 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.