Paper · 2007 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Effect of Different Tillage and Transplanting Methods on Soil Fertility and Root Growth of Rice

WU Jin-xiu

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of different tillage and transplanting methods on soil fertility and root growth of rice,three cultivars,Gangyou22,Ⅱyou162 and Kyou047,were studies with the methods of field experiments.The results showed as follows: The soil fertility was increased by treatment of the broadcasted among high standing-stubbles under no-tillage condition(BCSNT),and its content of organic matter,total N,K and available N,K was higher than those of conventional tillage transplanting rice,cast-transplanting rice and basic soil fertility.The root and top increment of BCSNT was lower than other treatments in early stage and its total root length and root number was the lowest in elongating,but it could delay senescence of root and top part in late stage.Compared with conventional tillage transplanting and cast-transplanting rice,BCSNT had the highest bleeding intensity in 30 d after heading.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BCSNT increased soil fertility and organic matter and nitrogen and potassium fractions.

Treatment
broadcasted among high standing-stubbles under no-tillage condition(BCSNT)e0
Outcome
soil fertilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventional tillage transplanting rice,cast-transplanting rice and basic soil fertilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil fertility was increased by treatment of the broadcasted among high standing-stubbles under no-tillage condition(BCSNT),and its content of organic matter,total N,K and available N,K was higher than those of conventional tillage transplanting rice,cast-transplanting rice and basic soil fertility.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early root and top increment under BCSNT was lower than other treatments.

Organ / stage
early stagee0
Treatment
BCSNTe0
Outcome
root and top incremente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The root and top increment of BCSNT was lower than other treatments in early stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BCSNT had the lowest root length and root number during elongation.

Organ / stage
elongatinge0
Treatment
BCSNTe1
Outcome
total root length and root numbere0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its total root length and root number was the lowest in elongating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“root and top increment of BCSNT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BCSNT delayed root and top senescence late in development.

Organ / stage
late stagee0
Treatment
BCSNTe1
Outcome
senescence of root and top parte0
Direction
delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it could delay senescence of root and top part in late stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“root and top increment of BCSNT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BCSNT had the highest bleeding intensity 30 days after heading.

Treatment
BCSNTe0
Outcome
bleeding intensitye0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
30 d after headinge0
Comparator
conventional tillage transplanting and cast-transplanting ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with conventional tillage transplanting and cast-transplanting rice,BCSNT had the highest bleeding intensity in 30 d after heading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–888 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: postharvest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

transplanting · quality: postharvest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

transplanting · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

tillage · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

tillage · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

149 papers: 116 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

145 papers more in this group

See all 149 papers →

transplanting · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 190 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 190 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.