Abstract
Starch characteristics and key nutritional compositions in transgenic rice with bar gene were compared with its original parent. It was found that peak viscosity, hot paste viscosity and cool paste viscosity of RVA profile between trans genic rice and its parent were significantly different at 1% level, respectively, but apparent amylose content, gel consistence and breakdown viscosity, setback viscosity of RVA profile were similar, and no significant differences existed in contents of crude protein, crude fat, total ash, amino acids and mineral compositions. It was suggested that no notable changes in grain quality traits had been caused by intergation of T DNA in transgenic rice genome.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Peak, hot paste and cool paste viscosity of the RVA profile differed significantly (1% level) between transgenic rice and its parent.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1 - Treatment
- trans genic ricee1
- Outcome
- peak viscosity, hot paste viscosity and cool paste viscositye1
- Qualifier
- 1% levele1
- Comparator
- its parente1
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“peak viscosity, hot paste viscosity and cool paste viscosity of RVA profile between trans genic rice and its parent were significantly different at 1% level”
Claim · model-written summary
Apparent amylose content and gel consistence were similar between transgenic rice and its parent.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- trans genic ricee0
- Outcome
- apparent amylose content, gel consistencee1
- Direction
- similare1
- Comparator
- its parente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“trans genic rice and its parent”
e1“apparent amylose content, gel consistence and breakdown viscosity, setback viscosity of RVA profile were similar”
Claim · model-written summary
Breakdown viscosity and setback viscosity of the RVA profile were similar between transgenic rice and its parent.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- trans genic ricee0
- Outcome
- breakdown viscosity, setback viscositye1
- Direction
- similare1
- Comparator
- its parente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“trans genic rice and its parent”
e1“apparent amylose content, gel consistence and breakdown viscosity, setback viscosity of RVA profile were similar”
Claim · model-written summary
No significant differences existed between transgenic rice and its parent in crude protein, crude fat and total ash contents.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- trans genic ricee0
- Outcome
- crude protein, crude fat, total ashe1
- Direction
- no significant differencese1
- Comparator
- its parente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“trans genic rice and its parent”
e1“no significant differences existed in contents of crude protein, crude fat, total ash, amino acids and mineral compositions”
Claim · model-written summary
No significant differences existed between transgenic rice and its parent in amino acid and mineral compositions.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- trans genic ricee0
- Outcome
- amino acids and mineral compositionse1
- Direction
- no significant differencese1
- Comparator
- its parente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“trans genic rice and its parent”
e1“no significant differences existed in contents of crude protein, crude fat, total ash, amino acids and mineral compositions”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest that integration of T-DNA in the transgenic rice genome caused no notable changes in grain quality traits.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- intergation of T DNAe1
- Outcome
- grain quality traitse1
- Direction
- no notable changese1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“no notable changes in grain quality traits had been caused by intergation of T DNA in transgenic rice genome”