Paper · 2013 · Modern Agricultural Science and Technology

Control Effects of Four Fungicides Against Wheat Sharp Eyespot

Fan Zhi-y

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The efficacy of four fungicides against the wheat sharp eyespot was measured.The results showed that two applications of the mixture of validamycin and Bacillus subtilis WP at the dosage of 6 000 g/hm2had better control effects on wheat sharp eyespot and white wheatears,which were 31.12% and 79.41%,respectively.Meanwhile,the harvest increased by 7.05%.The control effects on wheat sharp eyespot and white wheatears were 26.05% and 52.94% for 500 times 20% validamycin AF,and the harvest increased by 1.10%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two applications of the validamycin and Bacillus subtilis WP mixture at 6 000 g/hm2 gave a 31.12% control effect on wheat sharp eyespot.

Treatment
two applications of the mixture of validamycin and Bacillus subtilis WP at the dosage of 6 000 g/hm2e1
Outcome
control effects on wheat sharp eyespote1
Direction
bettere1
Value
31.12%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy of four fungicides against the wheat sharp eyespot was measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“two applications of the mixture of validamycin and Bacillus subtilis WP at the dosage of 6 000 g/hm2had better control effects on wheat sharp eyespot and white wheatears,which were 31.12% and 79.41%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same mixture gave a 79.41% control effect on white wheatears.

Treatment
two applications of the mixture of validamycin and Bacillus subtilis WP at the dosage of 6 000 g/hm2e1
Outcome
white wheatearse1
Direction
bettere1
Value
79.41%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy of four fungicides against the wheat sharp eyespot was measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“two applications of the mixture of validamycin and Bacillus subtilis WP at the dosage of 6 000 g/hm2had better control effects on wheat sharp eyespot and white wheatears,which were 31.12% and 79.41%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The validamycin and Bacillus subtilis WP mixture increased wheat harvest by 7.05%.

Treatment
two applications of the mixture of validamycin and Bacillus subtilis WP at the dosage of 6 000 g/hm2e1
Outcome
harveste2
Direction
increasede2
Value
7.05%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy of four fungicides against the wheat sharp eyespot was measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“two applications of the mixture of validamycin and Bacillus subtilis WP at the dosage of 6 000 g/hm2had better control effects on wheat sharp eyespot and white wheatears,which were 31.12% and 79.41%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–312 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meanwhile,the harvest increased by 7.05%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–353 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

500 times 20% validamycin AF gave a 26.05% control effect on wheat sharp eyespot.

Treatment
500 times 20% validamycin AFe3
Outcome
control effects on wheat sharp eyespote3
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Value
26.05%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy of four fungicides against the wheat sharp eyespot was measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e3

“The control effects on wheat sharp eyespot and white wheatears were 26.05% and 52.94% for 500 times 20% validamycin AF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

500 times 20% validamycin AF gave a 52.94% control effect on white wheatears.

Treatment
500 times 20% validamycin AFe3
Outcome
white wheatearse3
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Value
52.94%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy of four fungicides against the wheat sharp eyespot was measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e3

“The control effects on wheat sharp eyespot and white wheatears were 26.05% and 52.94% for 500 times 20% validamycin AF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

500 times 20% validamycin AF increased wheat harvest by 1.10%.

Treatment
500 times 20% validamycin AFe3
Outcome
harveste4
Direction
increasede4
Value
1.10%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy of four fungicides against the wheat sharp eyespot was measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e3

“The control effects on wheat sharp eyespot and white wheatears were 26.05% and 52.94% for 500 times 20% validamycin AF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–472 · show in text ↑
e4

“and the harvest increased by 1.10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–507 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.