Paper · 2012 · Journal of Jilin Forestry Science and Technology

Weeding test using goal and haloxyfop - methyl on seedbed of Larix olgensis

Piao Zhe-yan

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Weed removal in time is one of the crucial measures for cultivating healthy and high-yield seedlings.Goal is a broad spectrum and high effect herbicide,which can control more than 40 monocotyledonous and dicotyledon weeds.Haloxyfop-methyl is a high effect monocotyledonous weeds herbicide.In the seedbed of Larix olgensis,weed control effect could be over 90% when the soil was treated by goal as 1 500 mL.hm-2 in may before budding,and a mixture of goal and haloxyfop-methyl applied in June.Comparing to artificial weeding,chemical weeding can save 89.3% of labour and reduce the cost by 67.0%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goal followed by goal plus haloxyfop-methyl controlled more than 90% of seedbed weeds.

Treatment
goal as 1 500 mL.hm-2 in may before budding,and a mixture of goal and haloxyfop-methyl applied in Junee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control effecte0
Direction
overe0
Value
over 90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Larix gmelinii var. olgensis
Larix gmelinii var. olgensis · Taxon · picture of the speciesTrevbus · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the seedbed of Larix olgensis,weed control effect could be over 90% when the soil was treated by goal as 1 500 mL.hm-2 in may before budding,and a mixture of goal and haloxyfop-methyl applied in June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–491 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical weeding saved 89.3% of labor compared with manual weeding.

Treatment
chemical weedinge0
Outcome
laboure0
Direction
savee0
Value
89.3%e0
Comparator
artificial weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Larix gmelinii var. olgensis
Larix gmelinii var. olgensis · Taxon · picture of the speciesTrevbus · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing to artificial weeding,chemical weeding can save 89.3% of labour and reduce the cost by 67.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Larix olgensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical weeding reduced cost by 67.0% compared with manual weeding.

Treatment
chemical weedinge0
Outcome
coste0
Direction
reducee0
Value
67.0%e0
Comparator
artificial weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Larix gmelinii var. olgensis
Larix gmelinii var. olgensis · Taxon · picture of the speciesTrevbus · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing to artificial weeding,chemical weeding can save 89.3% of labour and reduce the cost by 67.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Larix olgensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–75 · show in text ↑