Paper · 2010

Effect of Topping on Physiological Index of Soybean at Different Time

Nannan Wang

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of different time of topping on physiological indexs of soybean was studied.The results showed that there was a certain extent of nodule number and chlorophyll contentthe of soybean at different time of topping,and the differences between them have reached a significant or highly significant level.While plant fresh weight,dry weight,root volume and other physiological index had no significant effect at early flowering stage(R1)and flowering stage(R2).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule number differed significantly among topping times.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
different time of toppinge0
Outcome
nodule numbere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a certain extent of nodule number and chlorophyll contentthe of soybean at different time of topping,and the differences between them have reached a significant or highly significant level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content differed significantly among topping times.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
different time of toppinge0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentthee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a certain extent of nodule number and chlorophyll contentthe of soybean at different time of topping,and the differences between them have reached a significant or highly significant level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At R1 and R2, topping had no significant effect on fresh weight, dry weight or root volume.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
early flowering stage(R1)and flowering stage(R2)e0
Treatment
Toppingt0
Outcome
plant fresh weight,dry weight,root volumee0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant fresh weight,dry weight,root volume and other physiological index had no significant effect at early flowering stage(R1)and flowering stage(R2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Topping on Physiological Index of Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–51 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

44 papers: 12 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

pruning · physiology: pigments · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pruning · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.