Paper · 2014 · Indian journal of plant protection

Evaluation of IPM modules for the management of Leucinodes orbonalis in brinjal

U. S. Nayak; L. K. Rath; K. Baral

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out to evaluate the performance of some IPM modules against Leucinodes orbonalis Guene on brinjal at Keonjhar district of Odisha during Kharif 2009 and 2010. The findings of the two years experiments revealed that the IPM module comprising of soil application of cartap hydrochloride 4 G @ 1 kg a.i./ha at 2 weeks of transplanting, intercropping with coriander in 3: 1 ratio, alternate foliar spray of indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 1 ml/l of water and rynaxypyr 20 SC @ 0.35 ml//l of water at 10 days interval twice at vegetative stage and six times commencing from fruiting stage and regular collection and destruction of infested shoots and fruits was found to be highly effective in minimizing the infestation of L. orbonalis with 84.11, 77.06, and 77.44 per cent reduction in shoot, flower bud and fruit damage respectively, over the farmers’ practice of indiscriminate application of different insecticides. This module resulted in the highest marketable fruit yield (231.02 q/ha) and maximum net return of Rs. 1, 09, 878.00 per hectare.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The IPM module reduced shoot damage 84.11% relative to farmer practice.

Treatment
IPM modulee0
Interactor
L. orbonalisLeucinodes orbonalise0pest
Outcome
shoot, flower bud and fruit damagee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
84.11e0
Comparator
farmers’ practice of indiscriminate application of different insecticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalis · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IPM module comprising of soil application of cartap hydrochloride 4 G @ 1 kg a.i./ha at 2 weeks of transplanting, intercropping with coriander in 3: 1 ratio, alternate foliar spray of indoxacarb 14.5 SC @ 1 ml/l of water and rynaxypyr 20 SC @ 0.35 ml//l of water at 10 days interval twice at vegetative stage and six times commencing from fruiting stage and regular collection and destruction of infested shoots and fruits was found to be highly effective in minimizing the infestation of L. orbonalis with 84.11, 77.06, and 77.44 per cent reduction in shoot, flower bud and fruit damage respectively, over the farmers’ practice of indiscriminate application of different insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The IPM module reduced flower bud damage 77.06% relative to farmer practice.

Treatment
IPM modulee1
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonalisLeucinodes orbonalist0pest
Outcome
flower bude0
Direction
reductione0
Value
77.06e0
Comparator
farmers’ practice of indiscriminate application of different insecticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalis · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“84.11, 77.06, and 77.44 per cent reduction in shoot, flower bud and fruit damage respectively, over the farmers’ practice of indiscriminate application of different insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–933 · show in text ↑
e1

“IPM module comprising of soil application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–290 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leucinodes orbonalis in brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The IPM module reduced fruit damage 77.44% relative to farmer practice.

Treatment
IPM modulee1
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonalisLeucinodes orbonalist0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
77.44 per cente0
Comparator
farmers’ practice of indiscriminate application of different insecticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalis · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“84.11, 77.06, and 77.44 per cent reduction in shoot, flower bud and fruit damage respectively, over the farmers’ practice of indiscriminate application of different insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–933 · show in text ↑
e1

“IPM module comprising of soil application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–290 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leucinodes orbonalis in brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The IPM module gave the highest marketable fruit yield of 231.02 q/ha.

Treatment
IPM modulee1
Outcome
marketable fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
231.02 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This module resulted in the highest marketable fruit yield (231.02 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“IPM module comprising of soil application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–290 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The IPM module gave the maximum net return of Rs. 1, 09, 878.00 per hectare.

Treatment
IPM modulee1
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs. 1, 09, 878.00 per hectaree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum net return of Rs. 1, 09, 878.00 per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“IPM module comprising of soil application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–290 · show in text ↑
t0

“brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–79 · show in text ↑

ipm · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results differ

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

ipm · quality: postharvest · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ipm · Leucinodes orbonalis · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.