Paper · 2001 · Acta Gossypii Sinica

Effect of Boron on Root Absorbing Capability, the Composition of Root Exudates and Root Bleeding Sap of Two Cotton Cultivars

Zhu Jian

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The differences of root absorbing capability, the composition of root exudates and root bleeding sap between a boron efficient cotton cultivar and a boron inefficient one were studied under a solution culture. Under the stress of boron deficiency, the root growth and absorbing capability of both cotton cultivars were inhibited. For examples, the weight, volume, active and total absorption area of their roots were decreased significantly, while those of boron inefficient cultivar declined more seriously than the boron efficient one. The ratio of root absorption area to root volume of the boron inefficient cultivar was reduced by boron deficiency, while that of the boron efficient one was raised. The influences of boron deficiency on the content of composition of root exudates and root bleeding sap of the two cultivars such as NO 3 , K +, inorganic phosphorus, soluble sugar and free amino acid were also different.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron deficiency inhibited root growth and absorbing capability of both cotton cultivars.

Material
cotton cultivarse1
Treatment
boron deficiencye1
Outcome
root growth and absorbing capabilitye1
Direction
inhibitede1
Setting
solution culturee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differences of root absorbing capability, the composition of root exudates and root bleeding sap between a boron efficient cotton cultivar and a boron inefficient one were studied under a solution culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under the stress of boron deficiency, the root growth and absorbing capability of both cotton cultivars were inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron deficiency significantly decreased root weight and volume in both cotton cultivars.

Material
cotton cultivarse1
Treatment
boron deficiencye1
Outcome
weight, volumee2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Under the stress of boron deficiency, the root growth and absorbing capability of both cotton cultivars were inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–328 · show in text ↑
e2

“the weight, volume, active and total absorption area of their roots were decreased significantly, while those of boron inefficient cultivar declined more seriously than the boron efficient one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron deficiency significantly decreased active and total root absorption area in both cotton cultivars.

Material
cotton cultivarse1
Treatment
boron deficiencye1
Outcome
active and total absorption areae2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Under the stress of boron deficiency, the root growth and absorbing capability of both cotton cultivars were inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–328 · show in text ↑
e2

“the weight, volume, active and total absorption area of their roots were decreased significantly, while those of boron inefficient cultivar declined more seriously than the boron efficient one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron deficiency declined root weight, volume and absorption area more seriously in the boron-inefficient cultivar than in the boron-efficient one.

Material
boron inefficient cultivare2
Treatment
boron deficiencye1
Outcome
weight, volume, active and total absorption area of their rootse2
Direction
declined more seriouslye2
Comparator
boron efficient onee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differences of root absorbing capability, the composition of root exudates and root bleeding sap between a boron efficient cotton cultivar and a boron inefficient one were studied under a solution culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under the stress of boron deficiency, the root growth and absorbing capability of both cotton cultivars were inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–328 · show in text ↑
e2

“the weight, volume, active and total absorption area of their roots were decreased significantly, while those of boron inefficient cultivar declined more seriously than the boron efficient one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron deficiency reduced the ratio of root absorption area to root volume in the boron-inefficient cultivar.

Material
boron inefficient cultivare3
Treatment
boron deficiencye3
Outcome
ratio of root absorption area to root volumee3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differences of root absorbing capability, the composition of root exudates and root bleeding sap between a boron efficient cotton cultivar and a boron inefficient one were studied under a solution culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e3

“The ratio of root absorption area to root volume of the boron inefficient cultivar was reduced by boron deficiency, while that of the boron efficient one was raised”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron deficiency raised the ratio of root absorption area to root volume in the boron-efficient cultivar.

Material
boron efficient onee3
Treatment
boron deficiencye3
Outcome
ratio of root absorption area to root volumee3
Direction
raisede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differences of root absorbing capability, the composition of root exudates and root bleeding sap between a boron efficient cotton cultivar and a boron inefficient one were studied under a solution culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e3

“The ratio of root absorption area to root volume of the boron inefficient cultivar was reduced by boron deficiency, while that of the boron efficient one was raised”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron deficiency made the contents of root exudate and root bleeding sap composition differ between the two cultivars.

Material
two cultivarse4
Treatment
boron deficiencye4
Outcome
content of composition of root exudates and root bleeding sape4
Qualifier
NO 3 , K +, inorganic phosphorus, soluble sugar and free amino acide4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differences of root absorbing capability, the composition of root exudates and root bleeding sap between a boron efficient cotton cultivar and a boron inefficient one were studied under a solution culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–208 · show in text ↑
e4

“The influences of boron deficiency on the content of composition of root exudates and root bleeding sap of the two cultivars such as NO 3 , K +, inorganic phosphorus, soluble sugar and free amino acid were also different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–924 · show in text ↑

boron atom · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

boron atom · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.