Paper · 1999 · Journal of Environmental Horticulture

Nitrogen Nutrition of Containerized Thuja x ‘Green Giant’

Jason J. Griffin; Stuart L. Warren; Frank A. Blazich; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Rooted stem cuttings of ‘Green Giant’ arborvitae ( Thuja L. x ‘Green Giant’) were grown in 3.8 liter (#1) plastic containers containing a pine bark: sand (8:1 by vol) substrate. Plants were fertilized three times weekly for 15 weeks with a complete nutrient solution at N application rates (NARs) of 0, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, or 320 mg/liter (ppm) supplied as ammonium nitrate (NH 4 NO 3 ). Both shoot and root dry weights were significantly affected by NAR. Maximum shoot weight, as predicted by a quadratic plateau model, was reached at a NAR of approximately 100 mg/liter (ppm), representing a 200% increase over controls [0 mg/liter (ppm) N]. Maximum and minimum root dry weights occurred at 0 mg/liter (ppm) N and approximately 50 mg/liter (ppm) N, respectively, representing a 37% decrease. Root length decreased 36% at a NAR of approximately 50 mg/liter (ppm). Root diameter (root area ÷ root length) increased before reaching a plateau at approximately 130 mg/liter (ppm) N indicating that root length decreased faster than root area at low N concentrations. Shoot concentrations of N, P, Mg, and S were maximized at approximately 71,41,48, and 52 mg/liter (ppm) N, respectively. Uptake of K and Ca were unaffected by N concentrations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry weight responded significantly to nitrogen rate.

Taxon
Thuja x ‘Green Giant’t0
Outcome
shoote0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Both shoot and root dry weights were significantly affected by NAR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thuja x ‘Green Giant’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight responded significantly to nitrogen rate.

Taxon
Thuja x ‘Green Giant’t0
Outcome
root dry weightse0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Both shoot and root dry weights were significantly affected by NAR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thuja x ‘Green Giant’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted maximum shoot weight at about 100 mg/liter N was 200% above controls.

Taxon
Thuja x ‘Green Giant’t0
Treatment
approximately 100 mg/liter (ppm)e0
Outcome
shoot weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
200%e0
Qualifier
as predicted by a quadratic plateau modele0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum shoot weight, as predicted by a quadratic plateau model, was reached at a NAR of approximately 100 mg/liter (ppm), representing a 200% increase over controls [0 mg/liter (ppm) N].”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thuja x ‘Green Giant’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight fell 37% from its maximum at zero N to its minimum around 50 mg/liter N.

Taxon
Thuja x ‘Green Giant’t0
Treatment
approximately 50 mg/liter (ppm) Ne0
Outcome
root dry weightse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
37%e0
Comparator
0 mg/liter (ppm) Ne0

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum and minimum root dry weights occurred at 0 mg/liter (ppm) N and approximately 50 mg/liter (ppm) N, respectively, representing a 37% decrease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thuja x ‘Green Giant’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length decreased 36% around 50 mg/liter N.

Taxon
Thuja x ‘Green Giant’t0
Treatment
approximately 50 mg/liter (ppm)e0
Outcome
Root lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
36%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Root length decreased 36% at a NAR of approximately 50 mg/liter (ppm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thuja x ‘Green Giant’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root diameter increased to a plateau around 130 mg/liter N.

Taxon
Thuja x ‘Green Giant’t0
Treatment
approximately 130 mg/liter (ppm) Ne0
Outcome
Root diametere0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“Root diameter (root area ÷ root length) increased before reaching a plateau at approximately 130 mg/liter (ppm) N indicating that root length decreased faster than root area at low N concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thuja x ‘Green Giant’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low N concentrations root length declined faster than root area.

Taxon
Thuja x ‘Green Giant’t0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
low N concentrationse0
Comparator
root areae0

Verbatim

e0

“root length decreased faster than root area at low N concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thuja x ‘Green Giant’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot N concentration peaked around 71 mg/liter N.

Taxon
Thuja x ‘Green Giant’t0
Organ / stage
Shoote0
Outcome
concentrations of Ne0
Direction
maximizede0
Value
71e0

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot concentrations of N, P, Mg, and S were maximized at approximately 71,41,48, and 52 mg/liter (ppm) N, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thuja x ‘Green Giant’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot P concentration peaked around 41 mg/liter N.

Taxon
Thuja x ‘Green Giant’t0
Organ / stage
Shoote0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
maximizede0
Value
41e0

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot concentrations of N, P, Mg, and S were maximized at approximately 71,41,48, and 52 mg/liter (ppm) N, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thuja x ‘Green Giant’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot Mg concentration peaked around 48 mg/liter N.

Taxon
Thuja x ‘Green Giant’t0
Organ / stage
Shoote0
Outcome
Mge0
Direction
maximizede0
Value
48e0

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot concentrations of N, P, Mg, and S were maximized at approximately 71,41,48, and 52 mg/liter (ppm) N, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thuja x ‘Green Giant’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot S concentration peaked around 52 mg/liter N.

Taxon
Thuja x ‘Green Giant’t0
Organ / stage
Shoote0
Outcome
Se0
Direction
maximizede0
Value
52e0

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot concentrations of N, P, Mg, and S were maximized at approximately 71,41,48, and 52 mg/liter (ppm) N, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thuja x ‘Green Giant’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K uptake was unaffected by N concentration.

Taxon
Thuja x ‘Green Giant’t0
Treatment
N concentrationse0
Outcome
Uptake of Ke0
Direction
unaffectede0

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake of K and Ca were unaffected by N concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thuja x ‘Green Giant’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca uptake was unaffected by N concentration.

Taxon
Thuja x ‘Green Giant’t0
Treatment
N concentrationse0
Outcome
Cae0
Direction
unaffectede0

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake of K and Ca were unaffected by N concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thuja x ‘Green Giant’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–57 · show in text ↑