Paper · 2016 · Plant Health Progress

Yield Losses Due to Crown Rust in Winter Oats in Alabama

K. L. Bowen; A. K. Hagan; M. Pegues; et al.

12
claims
28
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Crown rust is a common disease on winter oats in Alabama. While considered the most destructive disease of oats, little has been done in recent years, with current cultivars, to demonstrate yield losses due to crown rust. Field studies were conducted to determine the effect of fungicides and application timing on crown rust severity and yield. All fungicides reduced crown rust and improved yield. Two fungicide applications were better than a single fungicide application for reducing crown rust. Relative to yield, a single fungicide application during flag leaf development (FS 8-9) was better than a single application during head extension (FS 10.3). When compared with the non-treated control, significant yield gains were obtained with Tilt and Headline in all four years and Stratego YLD in three of four years. Fungicide programs resulted in a broad range of crown rust severities; disease levels were highly related to decreases in yield in each of four years. In two study years, ‘Coker 227’ was more damaged by crown rust, with about 10% yield loss for each unit disease, than was ‘Horizon 270,’ with 2.5 to 4.5% loss. However, in 2013, virulence patterns of the crown rust pathogen shifted and disease on Horizon 270 was greater than that on Coker 227; relative yield losses were also much lower in 2013. Accepted for publication 15 April 2016. Published 4 May 2016.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All fungicides reduced crown rust in winter oats.

Taxon
winter oatsAvena sativat0
Treatment
All fungicidese0
Outcome
crown ruste0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All fungicides reduced crown rust and improved yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All fungicides improved winter oat yield.

Taxon
winter oatsAvena sativat0
Treatment
All fungicidese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All fungicides reduced crown rust and improved yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two fungicide applications reduced crown rust more than one.

Taxon
winter oatsAvena sativat0
Treatment
Two fungicide applicationse0
Outcome
reducing crown ruste0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
a single fungicide applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two fungicide applications were better than a single fungicide application for reducing crown rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single application at flag leaf development improved yield more than one at head extension.

Taxon
winter oatsAvena sativat0
Treatment
a single fungicide application during flag leaf development (FS 8-9)e0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
a single application during head extension (FS 10.3)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single fungicide application during flag leaf development (FS 8-9) was better than a single application during head extension (FS 10.3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tilt gave significant yield gains in all four years versus no treatment.

Taxon
winter oatsAvena sativat0
Treatment
Tilte0
Outcome
yield gainse0
Direction
gainse0
Qualifier
all four yearse0
Comparator
non-treated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant yield gains were obtained with Tilt and Headline in all four years and Stratego YLD in three of four years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“When compared with the non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Headline gave significant yield gains in all four years versus no treatment.

Taxon
winter oatsAvena sativat0
Treatment
Headlinee0
Outcome
yield gainse0
Direction
gainse0
Qualifier
all four yearse0
Comparator
non-treated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant yield gains were obtained with Tilt and Headline in all four years and Stratego YLD in three of four years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“When compared with the non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stratego YLD gave significant yield gains in three of four years.

Taxon
winter oatsAvena sativat0
Treatment
Stratego YLDe0
Outcome
yield gainse0
Direction
gainse0
Qualifier
three of four yearse0
Comparator
non-treated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant yield gains were obtained with Tilt and Headline in all four years and Stratego YLD in three of four years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“When compared with the non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–700 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater crown rust disease was related to lower yield each year.

Taxon
winter oatsAvena sativat0
Interactor
crown ruste1pathogen
Outcome
decreases in yielde0
Direction
decreasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease levels were highly related to decreases in yield in each of four years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–45 · show in text ↑
e1

“All fungicides reduced crown rust and improved yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–398 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coker 227 lost about 10% yield per disease unit in two years.

Taxon
winter oatsAvena sativat0
Material
‘Coker 227’e0
Interactor
crown ruste0pathogen
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
about 10%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Coker 227’ was more damaged by crown rust, with about 10% yield loss for each unit disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Horizon 270 lost 2.5 to 4.5% yield per disease unit.

Taxon
winter oatsAvena sativat0
Material
Horizon 270e0
Outcome
losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
2.5 to 4.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Horizon 270,’ with 2.5 to 4.5% loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2013, Horizon 270 had more disease than Coker 227.

Taxon
winter oatsAvena sativat0
Material
Horizon 270e0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Coker 227e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease on Horizon 270 was greater than that on Coker 227”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative yield losses were much lower in 2013.

Taxon
winter oatsAvena sativat0
Outcome
relative yield lossese0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
2013e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative yield losses were also much lower in 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–45 · show in text ↑

fungicide · disease · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fungicide · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.