Paper · 2013 · Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer

Synergistic Phosphate Solubilization by Burkholderia anthina and Aspergillus awamori

Buddhi Charana Walpola; Hyo-Ju Jang; Min-Ho Yoon

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Single or co-inoculation of phosphate solubilizing bacterial and fungal strains (Burkholderia anthina and Aspergillus awamori respectively) was performed separately to assess their synergistic and antagonistic interactions and the potential to be used as bio-inoculants. Co-inoculation was found to release the highest content of soluble phosphorus (1253 ${\mu}g\;ml^{-1}$) into the medium, followed by single inoculation of fungal strain (1214 ${\mu}g\;ml^{-1}$) and bacterial strain (997 ${\mu}g\;ml^{-1}$). However, there was no significant difference between single inoculation of fungal strain and co-inoculation of fungal and bacterial strain in terms of the phosphorous release. The highest pH reduction, organic acid production and glucose consumption were observed in the sole A. awamori inoculated culture medium. According to the plant growth promotion bioassays, co-inoculation of the microbial strains resulted in 21% and 43% higher shoot and root growth of the mung bean seedlings respectively as compared to the respective controls. Therefore, co-inoculation of B. anthina and A. awamori showed better performance in stimulating plant growth than that in inoculation of each strain alone. However, assessment period of the present study being short, we recommend in engaging further experimentation under field conditions in order to test the suitability of the strains to be used as bio-inoculants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased mung bean shoot growth by 21% versus controls.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
co-inoculation of the microbial strainse0
Interactor
Burkholderia anthinaBurkholderia anthinat0symbiont
Second interactor
Aspergillus awamoriAspergillus awamorit0symbiont
Outcome
shoote0
Direction
highere0
Value
21%e0
Comparator
respective controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-inoculation of the microbial strains resulted in 21% and 43% higher shoot and root growth of the mung bean seedlings respectively as compared to the respective controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burkholderia anthina and Aspergillus awamori”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation increased mung bean root growth by 43% versus controls.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
co-inoculation of the microbial strainse0
Interactor
Burkholderia anthinaBurkholderia anthinat0symbiont
Second interactor
Aspergillus awamoriAspergillus awamorit0symbiont
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
43%e0
Comparator
respective controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-inoculation of the microbial strains resulted in 21% and 43% higher shoot and root growth of the mung bean seedlings respectively as compared to the respective controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Burkholderia anthina and Aspergillus awamori”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation stimulated plant growth better than either strain alone.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Treatment
co-inoculation of B. anthina and A. awamorie0
Interactor
B. anthinaBurkholderia anthinae0symbiont
Second interactor
A. awamoriAspergillus awamorie0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
inoculation of each strain alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-inoculation of B. anthina and A. awamori showed better performance in stimulating plant growth than that in inoculation of each strain alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1202 · show in text ↑
e1

“mung bean seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–994 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend field experiments to test the strains as bio-inoculants.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae1
Outcome
further experimentation under field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we recommend in engaging further experimentation under field conditions in order to test the suitability of the strains to be used as bio-inoculants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1413 · show in text ↑
e1

“mung bean seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–994 · show in text ↑

Burkholderia anthina · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 118 positive, 8 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.