Abstract
The synergistic effect on phosphate solubilization of single- and co-inoculation of two phosphate solubilizing bacteria, Burkholderia anthina PSB-15 and Enterobacter aerogenes PSB-16, was assessed in liquid medium and green gram plants. Co-inoculation of two strains was found to release the highest content of soluble phosphorus ($519{\mu}g\;mL^{-1}$) into the medium, followed by single inoculation of Burkholderia strain ($492{\mu}g\;mL^{-1}$) and Enterobacter strain ($483{\mu}g\;mL^{-1}$). However, there was no significant difference between single inoculation of bacterial strain and co-inoculation of two bacterial strains in terms of phosphorous release. The highest pH reduction, organic acid production, and glucose consumption were observed in the culture medium co-inoculated with PSB-15 and PSB-16 strains rather than that of single inoculation. Based on the plant growth promotion bioassay, co-inoculated mung bean seedlings recorded 9% and 8% higher shoot and root growth, respectively, compared to the control. Therefore, in conclusion, co-inoculation of the strains B. anthina and E. aerogenes displayed better performance in stimulating plant growth than inoculation of each strain alone. However, considering the short assessment period of the present study, we recommend engaging in further work under field conditions in order to test the suitability of these strains as bio-inoculants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculated mung bean seedlings had 9% higher shoot growth than controls.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Treatment
- co-inoculatede0
- Outcome
- shoot and root growthe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 9%e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“co-inoculated mung bean seedlings recorded 9% and 8% higher shoot and root growth, respectively, compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculated mung bean seedlings had 8% higher root growth than controls.
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatae0 - Treatment
- co-inoculatede0
- Outcome
- root growthe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 8%e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“co-inoculated mung bean seedlings recorded 9% and 8% higher shoot and root growth, respectively, compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation stimulated plant growth better than either single strain.
- Taxon
- green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatae1 - Treatment
- co-inoculation of the strains B. anthina and E. aerogenese0
- Interactor
- B. anthinaBurkholderia anthinae0symbiont
- Second interactor
- E. aerogenes
Klebsiella aerogenese0symbiont - Outcome
- stimulating plant growthe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- inoculation of each strain alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)

Verbatim
e0“co-inoculation of the strains B. anthina and E. aerogenes displayed better performance in stimulating plant growth than inoculation of each strain alone”
e1“green gram plants”
The same questions in other papers
Burkholderia anthina · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Klebsiella aerogenes · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
122 papers more in this group
See all 126 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.