Paper · 2011 · Tropicultura

Field Evaluation of Three Entomopathogenic Fungi on Groundnut pests

K. Sahayaraj; S. K. R. Namachivayam

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes), Paecilomyces fumosoroseus (Wize) (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes), Verticillium lecani Viegas (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes) were tested against groundnut pests, Aphis craccivora (Koch) (Homoptera: Aphididae), Aproarema modicella (Deventer) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), Mylabris pustulata Faust (Coleoptera: Meloidae) and Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in field conditions. Among the tested fungi, V. lecanii suppressed 62% of A. craccivora population at 39 Days After Seedling Emergence (DASE). During the same period, B. bassiana reduced 72% of S. litura larval population (0.73 larvae). The infestation of S. litura and A. modicella were greatly reduced after the treatment of B. bassiana; subsequently the yield (1721.31 kg/ha -1 ) and cost benefit ratio (1: 1.93) were increased. P. fumosoroseus and V. lecanii were less effective than B. bassiana. The persistence of fungal pathogens was found to be higher in soil than the phyllosphere indicating that they can be naturally favored for the control of pests in groundnut.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V. lecanii suppressed 62% of A. craccivora at 39 DASE.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
V. lecaniie0
Interactor
A. craccivoraAphis craccivorae0pest
Second interactor
V. lecaniiAkanthomyces lecaniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
A. craccivora populatione0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
62%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · InteractorSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Akanthomyces lecanii
Akanthomyces lecanii · Second interactorStephen Thorpe · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“V. lecanii suppressed 62% of A. craccivora population at 39 Days After Seedling Emergence (DASE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. bassiana reduced the S. litura larval population by 72% at the same time.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
B. bassianae0
Interactor
S. lituraSpodoptera liturae0pest
Second interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
S. litura larval populatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
72%e0
Qualifier
0.73 larvaee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. bassiana reduced 72% of S. litura larval population (0.73 larvae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. bassiana greatly reduced S. litura and A. modicella infestation.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
B. bassianae0
Interactor
S. lituraSpodoptera liturae0pest
Second interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
infestation of S. litura and A. modicellae0
Direction
greatly reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The infestation of S. litura and A. modicella were greatly reduced after the treatment of B. bassiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. bassiana treatment increased groundnut yield to 1721.31 kg/ha -1.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
B. bassianae0
Interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1721.31 kg/ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · InteractorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after the treatment of B. bassiana; subsequently the yield (1721.31 kg/ha -1 ) and cost benefit ratio (1: 1.93) were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. bassiana treatment increased the cost benefit ratio to 1: 1.93.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
B. bassianae0
Interactor
B. bassianaBeauveria bassianae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1: 1.93e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · InteractorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after the treatment of B. bassiana; subsequently the yield (1721.31 kg/ha -1 ) and cost benefit ratio (1: 1.93) were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fumosoroseus and V. lecanii were less effective than B. bassiana.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Interactor
P. fumosoroseuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
less effectivee0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
B. bassianae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. fumosoroseus and V. lecanii were less effective than B. bassiana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal pathogens persisted more in soil than the phyllosphere.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
persistence of fungal pathogense0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
phyllospheree0
Setting
soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The persistence of fungal pathogens was found to be higher in soil than the phyllosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1068 · show in text ↑
e1

“pests in groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that soil persistence can naturally favor pest control in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
control of pests in groundnute0
Qualifier
naturally favorede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indicating that they can be naturally favored for the control of pests in groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1152 · show in text ↑

Akanthomyces lecanii · Aphis craccivora · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Beauveria bassiana · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Beauveria bassiana · Spodoptera litura · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.