Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Field Demonstration of Indigenous Strains Bacillus thuringiensis and Beauveria bassiana for Sustainable Management of Spodoptera litura in Groundnut

M. Pradeep; G. Narayana Swamy; P. Pedda Nagi Reddy; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Nellore, evaluates the efficacy of biopesticides Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and Beauveria bassiana formulations against S. litura compared to conventional insecticides over two growing seasons (2018-19 and 2019-20). Twenty Front Line Demonstrations (FLDs) involving 20 farmers were conducted, with treatments applied when leaf damage exceeded 25%. Results indicated significant reductions in leaf damage (8.40% for biopesticides vs. 8.89% for insecticides) and larval populations. Specifically, larval counts decreased substantially after treatment, with average counts at 50 DAS dropping from 21.29 (FP) to 3.37 (Demo) in 2018-19 and from 22.15 (FP) to 3.53 (Demo) in 2019-20. Economic analysis revealed comparable net returns and benefit-cost ratios for both treatments (1.92 and 1.93 for biopesticides and insecticides, respectively). These findings support the economic viability of adopting biopesticide, promoting sustainable agricultural practices and profitability in groundnut cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticides gave significant reductions in leaf damage (8.40%) compared with insecticides (8.89%).

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
biopesticidese1
Interactor
S. lituraSpodoptera liturae2pest
Second interactor
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt)Bacillus thuringiensise2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
leaf damagee1
Direction
reductionse1
Value
8.40%e1
Qualifier
8.89% for insecticidese1
Comparator
insecticidese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus thuringiensis
Bacillus thuringiensis · Second interactorSam LaRussa · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spodoptera litura in Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated significant reductions in leaf damage (8.40% for biopesticides vs. 8.89% for insecticides) and larval populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–516 · show in text ↑
e2

“evaluates the efficacy of biopesticides Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and Beauveria bassiana formulations against S. litura compared to conventional insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticides gave significant reductions in larval populations.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and Beauveria bassiana formulationse2
Interactor
S. lituraSpodoptera liturae2pest
Second interactor
Beauveria bassianaBeauveria bassianae2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
larval populationse1
Direction
reductionse1
Comparator
conventional insecticidese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spodoptera litura in Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated significant reductions in leaf damage (8.40% for biopesticides vs. 8.89% for insecticides) and larval populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–516 · show in text ↑
e2

“evaluates the efficacy of biopesticides Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and Beauveria bassiana formulations against S. litura compared to conventional insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larval counts at 50 DAS dropped from 21.29 (FP) to 3.37 (Demo) in 2018-19.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
treatments applied when leaf damage exceeded 25%e6
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat0pest
Outcome
larval countse3
Direction
decreased substantiallye3
Value
21.29 (FP) to 3.37 (Demo)e3
Comparator
FPe3
Setting
2018-19e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spodoptera litura in Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–148 · show in text ↑
e3

“Specifically, larval counts decreased substantially after treatment, with average counts at 50 DAS dropping from 21.29 (FP) to 3.37 (Demo) in 2018-19 and from 22.15 (FP) to 3.53 (Demo) in 2019-20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–713 · show in text ↑
e6

“Twenty Front Line Demonstrations (FLDs) involving 20 farmers were conducted, with treatments applied when leaf damage exceeded 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–383 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larval counts at 50 DAS dropped from 22.15 (FP) to 3.53 (Demo) in 2019-20.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
treatments applied when leaf damage exceeded 25%e6
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturat0pest
Outcome
larval countse3
Direction
decreased substantiallye3
Value
22.15 (FP) to 3.53 (Demo)e3
Comparator
FPe3
Setting
2019-20e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spodoptera litura in Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–148 · show in text ↑
e3

“Specifically, larval counts decreased substantially after treatment, with average counts at 50 DAS dropping from 21.29 (FP) to 3.37 (Demo) in 2018-19 and from 22.15 (FP) to 3.53 (Demo) in 2019-20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–713 · show in text ↑
e6

“Twenty Front Line Demonstrations (FLDs) involving 20 farmers were conducted, with treatments applied when leaf damage exceeded 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–383 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns and benefit-cost ratios were comparable for biopesticides and insecticides.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
biopesticidese4
Outcome
net returns and benefit-cost ratiose4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Value
1.92 and 1.93e4
Comparator
insecticidese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spodoptera litura in Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–148 · show in text ↑
e4

“Economic analysis revealed comparable net returns and benefit-cost ratios for both treatments (1.92 and 1.93 for biopesticides and insecticides, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–873 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The findings support the economic viability of adopting biopesticides in groundnut cultivation.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae5
Outcome
economic viability of adopting biopesticidee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e5

“These findings support the economic viability of adopting biopesticide, promoting sustainable agricultural practices and profitability in groundnut cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1034 · show in text ↑

Bacillus thuringiensis · Spodoptera litura · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Beauveria bassiana · Spodoptera litura · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

biocontrol · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

biocontrol · Spodoptera litura · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.