Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Net returns and benefit-cost ratios were comparable for biopesticides and insecticides.

A claim from Field Demonstration of Indigenous Strains Bacillus thuringiensis and Beauveria bassiana for Sustainable Management of Spodoptera litura in Groundnut · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns and benefit-cost ratios were comparable for biopesticides and insecticides.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
biopesticidese4
Outcome
net returns and benefit-cost ratiose4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Value
1.92 and 1.93e4
Comparator
insecticidese4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spodoptera litura in Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–148
e4

“Economic analysis revealed comparable net returns and benefit-cost ratios for both treatments (1.92 and 1.93 for biopesticides and insecticides, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–873

Title

Field Demonstration of Indigenous Strains Bacillus thuringiensis and Beauveria bassiana for Sustainable Management of Spodoptera litura in Groundnut

M. Pradeep; G. Narayana Swamy; P. Pedda Nagi Reddy; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2024. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i114526

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-c281f14ccfe580fa493604f9776c29757c6e50bbae2e833146b4b2c71608fb47 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

biocontrol · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.