Paper · 2006 · Modern Agrochemicals

Study on the Biocontrol of Peanut Replant Disease by T.viride Agent

Tian Lian-sheng

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Diseased plants of peanut were picked from major peanut-growing areas in Hebei province with different replant years. Then the main pathogens causing root disease of peanut were separated from them and identified. The result showed that Fusarium spp. and Rhizoctonia spp. were two kinds of important pathogens which could infect root of peanut and cause replant disease jointly. Trichoderma strain T42 reduced the grow of these pathogens significantly. The anti-pathogen mechanism include nutrition and space competition and antibiotic effect. The field experiment of biocontrol showed that bioagent promoted growth and increased the production of peanut.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium and Rhizoctonia jointly infected peanut roots and caused replant disease.

Organ / stage
roote0
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariume0pathogen
Second interactor
Rhizoctonia spp.Rhizoctoniae0pathogen
Outcome
replant diseasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium spp. and Rhizoctonia spp. were two kinds of important pathogens which could infect root of peanut and cause replant disease jointly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma T42 significantly reduced growth of the pathogens.

Treatment
Trichoderma strain T42e0
Interactor
Trichoderma strain T42e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
grow of these pathogense0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma strain T42 reduced the grow of these pathogens significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bioagent promoted peanut growth in a field experiment.

Treatment
bioagente0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
promotede0
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment of biocontrol showed that bioagent promoted growth and increased the production of peanut.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bioagent increased peanut production in a field experiment.

Treatment
bioagente0
Outcome
production of peanute0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field experiment of biocontrol showed that bioagent promoted growth and increased the production of peanut.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–655 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

biocontrol · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.