Abstract
Six-week-old rough lemon ( Citrus jambhiri L.) seedlings uniform in size were transplanted from nursery to pots filled with peat, spent compost of mushroom and leaf manure used at different proportions with soil, sand and farm yard manure and grown in green house environment. Initial physical and chemical analysis of media indicated that electric conductivity (EC), total porosity, bulk density, moisture percentage, available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium are more suitable for citrus plant growth and development than other media of different compositions. Peat + sand (1:1) had pH 6.7 which is optimum for growth of citrus nursery. After every four weeks plant length, stem diameter, number of leaves and leaf area were measured. Leaf analysis for N, P, K and mortality percentage was measured at the end of the experiment. Peat + sand (1:1) produced highest percentage of transplant success, plant height, stem diameter, and number of leaves as compared to all other treatments tested. At initial stage peat + sand (1:1) gave the highest results in relation to leaf area, but at the end of experiment it was observed that treatment with silt + spent compost (button) + spent compost (oyster) (1:1:1), produced maximum leaf area with lush green leaves however, mortality rate was very high. This study suggests that peat + sand (1:1) may serve as a standard medium for the container grown citrus nursery.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Peat + sand (1:1) gave the highest transplant success, plant height and stem diameter of all media tested.
- Taxon
- rough lemon
Citrus jambhirie0 - Treatment
- Peat + sand (1:1)e1
- Outcome
- transplant success, plant height, stem diametere1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- all other treatments testede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“rough lemon ( Citrus jambhiri L.)”
e1“Peat + sand (1:1) produced highest percentage of transplant success, plant height, stem diameter, and number of leaves as compared to all other treatments tested”
Claim · model-written summary
Peat + sand (1:1) gave the highest number of leaves of all media tested.
- Taxon
- rough lemon
Citrus jambhirie0 - Treatment
- Peat + sand (1:1)e1
- Outcome
- number of leavese1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Comparator
- all other treatments testede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“rough lemon ( Citrus jambhiri L.)”
e1“Peat + sand (1:1) produced highest percentage of transplant success, plant height, stem diameter, and number of leaves as compared to all other treatments tested”
Claim · model-written summary
The silt + spent compost (button) + spent compost (oyster) medium gave the maximum leaf area at the end of the experiment.
- Taxon
- rough lemon
Citrus jambhirie0 - Treatment
- silt + spent compost (button) + spent compost (oyster) (1:1:1)e2
- Outcome
- leaf areae2
- Direction
- maximume2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“rough lemon ( Citrus jambhiri L.)”
e2“treatment with silt + spent compost (button) + spent compost (oyster) (1:1:1), produced maximum leaf area with lush green leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
Peat + sand (1:1) gave the highest leaf area at the initial stage.
- Taxon
- rough lemon
Citrus jambhirie0 - Treatment
- Peat + sand (1:1)e4
- Outcome
- leaf areae4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Qualifier
- At initial stagee4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“rough lemon ( Citrus jambhiri L.)”
e4“At initial stage peat + sand (1:1) gave the highest results in relation to leaf area”
Claim · model-written summary
The silt + spent compost (button) + spent compost (oyster) medium had a very high seedling mortality rate.
- Taxon
- rough lemon
Citrus jambhirie0 - Treatment
- silt + spent compost (button) + spent compost (oyster) (1:1:1)e2
- Outcome
- mortality ratee3
- Direction
- very highe3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“rough lemon ( Citrus jambhiri L.)”
e2“treatment with silt + spent compost (button) + spent compost (oyster) (1:1:1), produced maximum leaf area with lush green leaves”
e3“however, mortality rate was very high”
Claim · model-written summary
Peat + sand (1:1) is suggested as a standard medium for container-grown citrus nursery.
- Outcome
- standard mediume6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e6“peat + sand (1:1) may serve as a standard medium for the container grown citrus nursery”
Claim · model-written summary
Peat + sand (1:1) had a pH of 6.7, which is optimum for citrus nursery growth.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e5“Peat + sand (1:1) had pH 6.7 which is optimum for growth of citrus nursery”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Citrus jambhiri (rough lemon)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →fertilization · pest · Citrus jambhiri (rough lemon)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
growing medium · growth · Citrus jambhiri (rough lemon)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.