Paper · 2005 · PubMed

[Effects of different cutting system on main typical steppe populations in Inner Mongolia].

Qinghai Bao; Togeto Baoyin; Yankai Zhong; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Twelve main typical steppe populations in Inner Mongolia were selected to investigate the effects of different cutting system on their aboveground standing biomass. The results showed that the test populations could be categorized into 3 groups, i.e., (1) group with decreasing biomass, which included Leynzus chinensis, Agropyron michnoi, Caragana microphylla and Carex korshinskyi, with L. chinensis and C. microphylla as the representatives. The average aboveground standing biomass of L . chinensis was decreased by 63.37%, 64.96%, 45.64% and 34.18% after 2 cuttings a year, 1 cutting a year, 1 year cutting and 1 year resting, and 2 years cutting and 1 year resting, while that of C. microphylla decreased by 81.79%, 63.33%, 40.29% and 26.30%, respectively, compared with the control; (2) group with increasing biomass, which included Koeleria cristata, Artemisia scoparia, A . frigida, and Salsola collina, and K. cristata and A . frigida were the representatives. The biomass of K. cristata was increased by 94.84%, 287.79%, 132.86% and 211.74%, while that of A. frigida was increased by 193.02%, 210.47%, 154.65% and 160.47%, respectively. The biomass increase of K. cristata and A. frigida was derived from their population changes, while that of A. scoparia and S. collina was come from the decrease of community densities and the more suitable conditions for seed germination; (3) group with fluctuated biomass, which included Stipa grandis, Achnatherum sibiricum, Artemisia commutata and Serratula centauroides, and the change patterns of their biomass were between those of the former 2 groups.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. chinensis biomass declined by 63.37%, 64.96%, 45.64%, and 34.18% under four cutting regimes.

Taxon
L . chinensise0
Treatment
2 cuttings a year, 1 cutting a year, 1 year cutting and 1 year resting, and 2 years cutting and 1 year restinge0
Outcome
aboveground standing biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
63.37%, 64.96%, 45.64% and 34.18%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The average aboveground standing biomass of L . chinensis was decreased by 63.37%, 64.96%, 45.64% and 34.18% after 2 cuttings a year, 1 cutting a year, 1 year cutting and 1 year resting, and 2 years cutting and 1 year resting, while that of C. microphylla decreased by 81.79%, 63.33%, 40.29% and 26.30%, respectively, compared with the control;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. microphylla biomass declined by 81.79%, 63.33%, 40.29%, and 26.30% under four cutting regimes.

Taxon
C. microphyllaCaragana microphyllae0
Treatment
2 cuttings a year, 1 cutting a year, 1 year cutting and 1 year resting, and 2 years cutting and 1 year restinge0
Outcome
aboveground standing biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
81.79%, 63.33%, 40.29% and 26.30%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The average aboveground standing biomass of L . chinensis was decreased by 63.37%, 64.96%, 45.64% and 34.18% after 2 cuttings a year, 1 cutting a year, 1 year cutting and 1 year resting, and 2 years cutting and 1 year resting, while that of C. microphylla decreased by 81.79%, 63.33%, 40.29% and 26.30%, respectively, compared with the control;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K. cristata biomass increased under the four cutting regimes.

Taxon
Koeleria cristataKoeleria pyramidatae2
Treatment
2 cuttings a year, 1 cutting a year, 1 year cutting and 1 year resting, and 2 years cutting and 1 year restinge1
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
94.84%, 287.79%, 132.86% and 211.74%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Koeleria pyramidata
Koeleria pyramidata · TaxonDiane Corbin · CC BY-SA 2.0 fr · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of K. cristata was increased by 94.84%, 287.79%, 132.86% and 211.74%, while that of A. frigida was increased by 193.02%, 210.47%, 154.65% and 160.47%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1147 · show in text ↑
e1

“2 cuttings a year, 1 cutting a year, 1 year cutting and 1 year resting, and 2 years cutting and 1 year resting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–670 · show in text ↑
e2

“Koeleria cristata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. frigida biomass increased under the four cutting regimes.

Taxon
A . frigidaArtemisia frigidae2
Treatment
2 cuttings a year, 1 cutting a year, 1 year cutting and 1 year resting, and 2 years cutting and 1 year restinge1
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
193.02%, 210.47%, 154.65% and 160.47%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Artemisia frigida
Artemisia frigida · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of K. cristata was increased by 94.84%, 287.79%, 132.86% and 211.74%, while that of A. frigida was increased by 193.02%, 210.47%, 154.65% and 160.47%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1147 · show in text ↑
e1

“2 cuttings a year, 1 cutting a year, 1 year cutting and 1 year resting, and 2 years cutting and 1 year resting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–670 · show in text ↑
e2

“Artemisia scoparia, A . frigida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–890 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass increase in K. cristata and A. frigida derived from population changes.

Taxon
K. cristata and A. frigidaKoeleria pyramidataArtemisia frigidae0
Outcome
biomass increasee0
Qualifier
population changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Koeleria pyramidata
Koeleria pyramidata · TaxonDiane Corbin · CC BY-SA 2.0 fr · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Artemisia frigida
Artemisia frigida · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass increase of K. cristata and A. frigida was derived from their population changes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1240 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass increase in A. scoparia and S. collina derived from lower community density and suitable germination conditions.

Taxon
A. scoparia and S. collinaArtemisia scopariaSalsola collinae0
Outcome
biomass increasee1
Qualifier
decrease of community densities and the more suitable conditions for seed germinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Artemisia scoparia
Artemisia scoparia · TaxonMokkie · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Salsola collina
Salsola collina · TaxonUrgamal Magsar · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while that of A. scoparia and S. collina was come from the decrease of community densities and the more suitable conditions for seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1386 · show in text ↑
e1

“biomass increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1168 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four other steppe populations showed fluctuating biomass.

Taxon
Stipa grandis, Achnatherum sibiricum, Artemisia commutata and Serratula centauroidesKlasea centauroidesArtemisia commutataStipa grandisStipa sibiricae0
Outcome
fluctuated biomasse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Klasea centauroides
Klasea centauroides · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryЮлия · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Artemisia commutata
Artemisia commutata · TaxonUrgamal Magsar · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Stipa sibirica
Stipa sibirica · TaxonЮлия · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“group with fluctuated biomass, which included Stipa grandis, Achnatherum sibiricum, Artemisia commutata and Serratula centauroides, and the change patterns of their biomass were between those of the former 2 groups.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1607 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Artemisia frigidaPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.