Paper · 2016 · South African Journal of Botany

Combined effect of foliar-applied salicylic acid and deficit irrigation on physiological–anatomical responses, and yield of squash plants under saline soil

T.A. Abd El-Mageed; W.M. Semida; G.F. Mohamed; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
88
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salicylic acid (SA) controls plant growth and induces water deficit tolerance in plants. Summer and fall season experiments were conducted in 2013 to study the effect of 1 mM SA on growth, anatomy, yield, chlorophyll fluorescence, osmoprotectants and water use efficiency (WUE) of squash plants under three levels of irrigation (I100 = 100%, I80 = 80% and I60 = 60% of crop evapotranspiration. Growth, chlorophyll fluorescence, leaf anatomy, leaf photosynthetic pigments, total soluble sugars (TSS), proline, harvest index (HI), yield and WUE were significantly affected by both deficit irrigation (DI) and the combined DI + exogenously applied SA treatment. The combined DI + SA treatment modified the adverse effects of DI and enhanced all aforesaid parameters, while decreased proline concentrations. The combined treatment of I60 or I80 + SA produced plants having yields and WUE as produced with the plants generated under full irrigation conditions without SA treatment. From these results, we conclude that with exogenously applied 1 mM SA, the I60 or I80 strategy studied here could be successfully applied during summer and fall seasons for the production of commercial squash allowing water savings of 20%–40% without any detrimental effect on plant growth or yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation and its combination with salicylic acid significantly affected squash growth, fluorescence and leaf anatomy.

Taxon
squash plantst0
Treatment
deficit irrigation (DI)e0
Outcome
Growth, chlorophyll fluorescence, leaf anatomye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Growth, chlorophyll fluorescence, leaf anatomy, leaf photosynthetic pigments, total soluble sugars (TSS), proline, harvest index (HI), yield and WUE were significantly affected by both deficit irrigation (DI) and the combined DI + exogenously applied SA treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“squash plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined deficit irrigation and salicylic acid treatment improved squash physiological and production measures.

Taxon
squash plantst0
Treatment
combined DI + SA treatmente0
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic pigments, total soluble sugars (TSS)e1
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
DIe0

Verbatim

e0

“The combined DI + SA treatment modified the adverse effects of DI and enhanced all aforesaid parameters, while decreased proline concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–803 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf photosynthetic pigments, total soluble sugars (TSS), proline, harvest index (HI), yield and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“squash plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined deficit irrigation and salicylic acid treatment decreased squash proline concentration.

Taxon
squash plantst0
Treatment
combined DI + SA treatmente0
Outcome
proline concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
DIe0

Verbatim

e0

“The combined DI + SA treatment modified the adverse effects of DI and enhanced all aforesaid parameters, while decreased proline concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“squash plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I60 or I80 plus salicylic acid produced yields and water-use efficiency comparable to full irrigation without salicylic acid.

Taxon
squash plantst0
Treatment
I60 or I80 + SAe0
Outcome
yields and WUEe0
Direction
as producede0
Comparator
full irrigation conditions without SA treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“The combined treatment of I60 or I80 + SA produced plants having yields and WUE as produced with the plants generated under full irrigation conditions without SA treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“squash plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–137 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend I60 or I80 with 1 mM salicylic acid for commercial squash production with 20%–40% water savings.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
exogenously applied 1 mM SAe0
Outcome
water savingse0
Value
20%–40%e0

Verbatim

e0

“with exogenously applied 1 mM SA, the I60 or I80 strategy studied here could be successfully applied during summer and fall seasons for the production of commercial squash allowing water savings of 20%–40% without any detrimental effect on plant growth or yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1276 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · physiology: water · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.