Paper · 2001 · PubMed

Effects of glufosinate-ammonium on off crop vegetation--interim results.

G R De Snoo; F M De Jong; R J Van Der Poll; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In 2000 a field study was conducted at four different locations concerning the effects of low dosages of glufosinate-ammonium, a leaf acting herbicide, on off crop vegetation. Therefore species rich road verges and ditch banks not adapted to a history of herbicide use were sprayed twice with different dosages of glufosinate-ammonium, simulating drift (0, 2, 4, 16, 32 and 64% of the maximum field dose: 800 g a.i./ha). The parameters studied were short term phytotoxic effects and the effects on biomass, species cover and number of species in autumn (Braun-Blanquêt relevés). The results show significant phytotoxic effects at all dosages of glufosinate-ammonium on the non-target vegetation. The low concentrations (2 and 4%) had most impact when applied early in the season (9% average at the 2% dosage and 22% at 4% dosage, after the first spraying. At high dosages (32 and 64%) a decrease of the biomass of the vegetation was found in August. A comparison between treatments in August shows a small decrease in species number and cover in the 64% compared to the control. In the comparison between the spring and August relevés, the decrease in the mean number of species was significantly stronger in the treated plots than in the untreated ones of 4% and higher. For monocotyledons in all treatments except 16%, a significantly stronger decrease in species number was found compared to the untreated. For dicotyledons only the 64% dosage differed from the untreated. Only at the 64% treatment the total cover of species decreased more than in the untreated plots. Since drift percentages of 2-4% can be expected at 1-2 m from a treated plot it can be concluded that the use of glufosinate-ammonium could result in visible short term phytotoxic effects (max 22%) on off-crop vegetation such as ditch banks and verges. There are also indications that effects on the number and cover of species in autumn can occur. Because in future glufosinate-ammonium could be used on a large scale in herbicide resistant crops like maize, which will be cultivated on the same field for many years, this study will be continued in 2001 in order to investigate if there are--whether or not--sustainable effects on the off crop vegetation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate-ammonium caused significant phytotoxic effects at all dosages on non-target vegetation.

Taxon
off crop vegetationt0
Treatment
glufosinate-ammoniume0
Outcome
phytotoxic effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“off crop vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant phytotoxic effects at all dosages of glufosinate-ammonium on the non-target vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2% dosage of glufosinate-ammonium had most impact when applied early in the season, averaging 9% after the first spraying.

Taxon
off crop vegetationt0
Treatment
2% dosagee0
Outcome
impacte0
Direction
most impacte0
Value
9% averagee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“off crop vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“The low concentrations (2 and 4%) had most impact when applied early in the season (9% average at the 2% dosage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4% dosage of glufosinate-ammonium had most impact when applied early in the season, reaching 22% after the first spraying.

Taxon
off crop vegetationt0
Treatment
4% dosagee0
Outcome
impacte0
Direction
most impacte0
Value
22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“off crop vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“The low concentrations (2 and 4%) had most impact when applied early in the season (9% average at the 2% dosage and 22% at 4% dosage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High dosages (32 and 64%) of glufosinate-ammonium decreased vegetation biomass in August.

Taxon
off crop vegetationt0
Treatment
high dosages (32 and 64%)e0
Outcome
biomass of the vegetatione0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
in Auguste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“off crop vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“At high dosages (32 and 64%) a decrease of the biomass of the vegetation was found in August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In August, the 64% dosage caused a small decrease in species number and cover compared with the control.

Taxon
off crop vegetationt0
Treatment
the 64%e0
Outcome
species number and covere0
Direction
small decreasee0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

t0

“off crop vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“A comparison between treatments in August shows a small decrease in species number and cover in the 64% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

From spring to August the decrease in mean species number was significantly stronger in treated plots at 4% and higher than in untreated plots.

Taxon
off crop vegetationt0
Treatment
treated plotse0
Outcome
mean number of speciese0
Direction
strongere0
Qualifier
4% and highere0
Comparator
untreated onese0

Verbatim

t0

“off crop vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“the decrease in the mean number of species was significantly stronger in the treated plots than in the untreated ones of 4% and higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocotyledons showed a significantly stronger decrease in species number than untreated plots in all treatments except 16%.

Taxon
monocotyledonsLiliopsidae0
Treatment
all treatments except 16%e0
Outcome
species numbere0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
the untreatede0

Verbatim

t0

“off crop vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“For monocotyledons in all treatments except 16%, a significantly stronger decrease in species number was found compared to the untreated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For dicotyledons only the 64% dosage differed from the untreated plots.

Taxon
dicotyledonse0
Treatment
64% dosagee0
Outcome
differede0
Comparator
the untreatede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“off crop vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“For dicotyledons only the 64% dosage differed from the untreated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only the 64% treatment decreased total species cover more than in the untreated plots.

Taxon
off crop vegetationt0
Treatment
64% treatmente0
Outcome
total cover of speciese0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
the untreated plotse0

Verbatim

t0

“off crop vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Only at the 64% treatment the total cover of species decreased more than in the untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that spray drift of glufosinate-ammonium could cause visible short-term phytotoxic effects, up to 22%, on off-crop vegetation.

Taxon
off-crop vegetatione0
Treatment
glufosinate-ammoniume0
Outcome
visible short term phytotoxic effectse0
Value
max 22%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the use of glufosinate-ammonium could result in visible short term phytotoxic effects (max 22%) on off-crop vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effecthypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There are indications that effects on species number and cover in autumn can occur.

Taxon
off crop vegetationt0
Treatment
glufosinate-ammoniumt1
Outcome
number and cover of speciese0
Qualifier
in autumne0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“off crop vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–54 · show in text ↑
t1

“glufosinate-ammonium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“There are also indications that effects on the number and cover of species in autumn can occur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–1920 · show in text ↑