Paper · 2009 · PubMed

Oligogalacturonides induce resistance in wheat against powdery mildew.

B Randoux; D Renard-Merlier; F Duyme; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Biological activities, priming and protective effects of two oligogalacturonides fractions (OGAs) were assayed during a compatible wheat/Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici interaction. These fractions were obtained from commercial polygalacturonic acid. They both consisted of oligogalacturonides with polymerisation degrees (DP) ranging from 2 to 25, and one of them was a 30% chemically acetylated fraction. A 5 g x L(-1) solution of each fraction was infiltrated in the first leave of ten-days-old plantlets, and activities of defence-related enzymes were measured 48H post-treatment. Among them, oxalate oxidase and peroxidase activities increased, suggesting an elicitation due to both fractions of oligogalacturonides. Some of the pre-treated plantlets were subsequently submitted to powdery mildew infection. As revealed by 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining, the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at the penetration site of the fungus increased 21H after inoculation to the same extent in areas of plantlets infiltrated by both fractions. On the other hand, the intensity of fluorescence associated with papillae was higher when plantlets were pre-infiltrated with the acetylated fraction, whereas no difference was observed between control plantlets and those treated with the non-acetylated fraction. Moreover, microscopic assessment of the number of haustoria occurring 40H post-inoculation showed it was only reduced when acetylated fraction was used. Despite different modes of action of these molecules, a similar 45% protective effect occurred in both cases when the oligogalacturonides fractions were sprayed on ten-days-old plantlets.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both oligogalacturonide fractions increased oxalate oxidase and peroxidase activities.

Treatment
both fractions of oligogalacturonidese0
Outcome
oxalate oxidase and peroxidase activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“oxalate oxidase and peroxidase activities increased, suggesting an elicitation due to both fractions of oligogalacturonides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fractions increased hydrogen peroxide accumulation at the fungal penetration site 21 hours after inoculation.

Treatment
both fractionse0
Interactor
Blumeria graminis f. sp. triticiBlumeria graminis f. sp. triticie1pathogen
Outcome
accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at the penetration site of the funguse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
21H after inoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici
Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Clemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at the penetration site of the fungus increased 21H after inoculation to the same extent in areas of plantlets infiltrated by both fractions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1052 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The acetylated fraction increased fluorescence associated with papillae.

Treatment
pre-infiltrated with the acetylated fractione0
Outcome
intensity of fluorescence associated with papillaee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“intensity of fluorescence associated with papillae was higher when plantlets were pre-infiltrated with the acetylated fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The non-acetylated fraction did not change papillae fluorescence relative to controls.

Treatment
treated with the non-acetylated fractione0
Outcome
fluorescence associated with papillaee1
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
control plantletse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“no difference was observed between control plantlets and those treated with the non-acetylated fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1316 · show in text ↑
e1

“fluorescence associated with papillae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only the acetylated fraction reduced haustoria number 40 hours after inoculation.

Treatment
acetylated fractione0
Outcome
number of haustoriae0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
40H post-inoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of haustoria occurring 40H post-inoculation showed it was only reduced when acetylated fraction was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed oligogalacturonide fractions each produced a 45% protective effect.

Organ / stage
ten-days-old plantletse0
Treatment
oligogalacturonides fractions were sprayede0
Outcome
protective effecte0
Value
45%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“a similar 45% protective effect occurred in both cases when the oligogalacturonides fractions were sprayed on ten-days-old plantlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1657 · show in text ↑

application · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.