application · Control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)

Initial and Residual Activity of Cidial (Phenthoate) Compared with that of Malathion and Lindane on Insects Affecting Stored Products1 · 1969

• positive
  Cidial sprayed at 8 and 4 ppm on wheat gave almost complete control for at least one year of most stored-product insect species.

PROPANIL FOR CONTROL OF GREEN FOXTAIL IN WHEAT AND BARLEY · 1980

• positive
  Control of green foxtail was significantly better at a spray pressure of 310 kPa than at 207 kPa

  compared with 207 kPa

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFICACY AND ECONOMIC RETURNS OF AERIAL SPRAYS AGAINST THE WHEAT MIDGE, SITODIPLOSIS MOSELLANA (GÉHIN) (DIPTERA: CECIDOMYIIDAE) · 1988

• positive
  The low-volume chlorpyrifos spray followed the high-volume spray in midge control, 87%.

  compared with high-volume (37.4 L water per hectare) chlorpyrifos spray

• positive
  The low-volume chlorpyrifos spray followed the high-volume spray in kernel protection, 76%.

  compared with high-volume (37.4 L water per hectare) chlorpyrifos spray

• positive
  Sprays protected kernels better in apical than in basal regions of each head type.

  compared with basal regions

• positive
  The high-volume chlorpyrifos spray gave the best kernel protection, 87%.

  compared with low-volume (18.7 L water per hectare) chlorpyrifos spray

• positive
  The high-volume chlorpyrifos spray gave the best midge control, 95%.

  compared with low-volume (18.7 L water per hectare) chlorpyrifos spray

• positive
  Sprays gave more effective midge control and kernel protection in primary heads than in tiller heads.

  compared with tiller heads

• positive
  The low-volume dimethoate spray followed the high-volume spray in kernel protection, 53%.

  compared with high-volume (37.4 L water per hectare) chlorpyrifos spray

• positive
  The low-volume dimethoate spray followed the high-volume spray in midge control, 66%.

  compared with high-volume (37.4 L water per hectare) chlorpyrifos spray

Factors affecting development of Septoria tritici in winter wheat and its effect on yield · 1989

• positive
  Spray sequences starting after GS 31 but just before the critical periods gave the best disease control and yield benefit.

Biological Characterization of Uptake, Translocation, and Dissipation of Difenoconazole (CGA 169374) in Wheat, Peanut, and Tomato Plants · 1992

• positive
  Difenoconazole penetrated sprayed plants sufficiently for excellent disease control.

Reduced Rates of Foliar Insecticides for Control of Russian Wheat Aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Western Canada · 1993

• positive
  Field application with a bicycle sprayer gave better aphid control than cabinet-sprayer application (93–97% versus 80–83%).

  compared with cabinet-sprayer applications

Effect of Rainfall on Glyphosate Plus 2,4-D Performance onEchinochloa crus-galli · 1995

• positive
  Watering drought-stressed barnyardgrass six days before spraying generally gave similar or better control than later watering.

  compared with later watering dates

Reduced Fungicide Inputs in Winter Wheat · 1998

• positive
  Spray additives improved disease control in half-rate treatments.

  compared with half rate treatments

Biological Activity of Four Strobilurin Fungicides against Wheat Power Mildew · 2004

• positive
  Foliar SYP-1620 gave two weeks of residual control.

Study on Application Technique of MKJ Control Dicotyledonous Weed in Wheat Field · 2004

• positive
  MKJ sprayed on stems and leaves controlled about 90%–95% of dicotyledonous weeds.

Effect of 10%Ph1 EC for controlling wheat sharp eyespot and wheat take-all · 2004

• positive
  Dipping wheat seed in 80μg/mL Ph1 gave 55.90% control of wheat sharp eyespot.
• positive
  Control of wheat sharp eyespot was 10.94% higher than with CPF10 seed treatment.

  compared with 3.3×10~7cfu/mL CPF10 wheat seed

• positive
  Dipping wheat seed in 80μg/mL Ph1 gave 68.17% control of wheat take-all.
• positive
  Control of wheat take-all was 11.39% higher than with CPF10 seed treatment.

  compared with 3.3×10~7cfu/mL CPF10 wheat seed

• positive
  Control of wheat sharp eyespot was 5.09% higher than with carbendazim seed treatment.

  compared with 1g/100g carbendazim wheat seed

• positive
  Control of wheat take-all was 3.78% higher than with triazolone seed treatment.

  compared with 80μg/mL triazolone wheat seed

Effect of BTH on resistance induction in wheat against Blumeria graminis f.sp.tritici · 2005

• positive
  The control effect of BTH spraying on adult wheat was 16% higher than the untreated.

  compared with the untreated

• positive
  Spraying adult wheat with 0.20 mmol/L BTH twice at tillering gave a control effect of 60.82%.

  compared with the untreated

Study on the chemical control of wheat black point · 2005

• positive
  Spraying 22% Maiyejing WP diluted 800 times gave over 60% average control effect.
• positive
  Spraying 12.5% Diniconazole WP diluted 1500 times gave over 60% average control effect.
• positive
  Spraying 22% Maiyejing WP diluted 600 times gave the best field control effect, averaging 80.59%.
• positive
  Spraying 25% Tilt EC diluted 1000 times gave 74.97% average control effect and ranked second.

Researchon the Weeding Technique of Applying Pinoxaden·Clodinafop-propargyl(Daneng) in the Continuous Cropping Rice Stubble Wheat Field · 2009

• positive
  Three sprayers at the same spray volume gave similar good control of young grass weeds.

  compared with 3 different sprayers

Oligogalacturonides induce resistance in wheat against powdery mildew. · 2009

• positive
  Sprayed oligogalacturonide fractions each produced a 45% protective effect.

New aspects in use of fungicides for control Fusarium head blight · 2010

• positive
  Spraying 36–48 hours after inoculation achieved the best efficacy of 80–90%.

Study on Control Efficiency of Zuelaemycin 1.2% SL Fluid to Powdery Mildew in Wheat · 2012

• positive
  Two sprays at 650 times dilution before heading and after anthesis gave 10% protective effect against wheat powdery mildew.

Biological activity of growth regulators used with adjuvants in winter wheat crops · 2014

• positive
  Adding adjuvants to the CCC spray liquid improved the efficacy of growth retardants, particularly under unfavorable weather.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of entomopathogens for the management of wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae) on spring wheat · 2014

• positive
  Soil drenches of all three fungi were more effective for wireworm control than seed coating.

  compared with seed-coating treatments

Biological activity of growth regulators used with adjuvants in winter wheat crops · 2014

• positive
  Adjuvants improved the efficacy of CCC growth retardant, particularly in unfavorable weather.

Management of stripe rust of wheat through fungicides and application timing · 2015

• positive
  Two sprays of propiconazole at 0.1% provided 91.5 per cent disease control.

Study on Chemical Control Technique of Wheat Sharp Eyespot · 2015

• positive
  Spraying at jointing stage with mix-fungicides 5 at 900 mL·hm-2 gave a control effect superior to other spraying treatments on wheat sharp eyespot.

  compared with spraying by others

Combined Effect of Salicylic Acid and Nitrogen Oxide Donor on Stress-Protective System of Wheat Plants under Drought Conditions · 2018

• positive
  Combining seed treatment with 10 μM SA and spraying with 0.5 mM SNP enhanced the protective effect in wheat.

  compared with their combinations in higher concentrations

Effect of Hydrogen Sulfide Donor on Antioxidant State of Wheat Plants and Their Resistance to Soil Drought · 2019

• positive
  NaHS spraying before drought significantly alleviated growth suppression in young winter wheat.

Application method affects pesticide efficiency and effectiveness in wheat fields · 2019

• positive
  Unmanned aerial vehicle and mister sprayers increased control efficacy of the 48% phenamacril-tebuconazole SC against wheat FHB and mycotoxins.

cited by 1 paper here

Induced plant immunity as a factor of an integrated winter wheat disease protection system · 2021

• positive
  Early spring spraying had the leading protective role.

Using tank‐mix adjuvant improves the physicochemical properties and dosage delivery to reduce the use of pesticides in unmanned aerial vehicles for plant protection in wheat · 2022

• positive
  At one third reduced dosage, the spray solution retained excellent disease control.

Response Wheat to Spray Some of Synthetic Nano Fertilizers · 2022

• positive
  Foliar tri-combination treatment had agronomic efficacy of 1850.00 kg kg-1.

Induced systemic resistance to wheat take-all disease by probiotic bacteria · 2023

• positive
  Chemical inducers and bacterial strains AS and P2 had the highest effect on suppression of take-all disease with shoot spray.

Native rhizobacteria suppresses spot blotch disease, improves growth and yield of wheat under salt–affected soils · 2023

• positive
  Dual seed and foliar rhizobacterial inoculation improved disease suppression by 13.2–148.1%.

Nano protective membrane coated wheat to resist powdery mildew · 2024

• positive
  Advance KTP spraying achieved 83.04% powdery mildew control in field experiments.
• positive
  Advance KTP spraying achieved 98.45% powdery mildew control in pot experiments.

Effect of Different Foliar Application of Nutrients on Growth Characters, Yield Contributing Characters and Yield of Wheat · 2024

• positive
  Foliar application of nutrients increased wheat yield over control by 73.16%.

  compared with control

Comparison of the Effectiveness of UAV and Conventional Sprayers in Wheat Disease Control · 2025

• positive
  The best fungicide efficacy was achieved with a back motor sprayer at 100 and 300 L/ha.
• negative
  Fungicide efficacy with UAV at 10 L/ha was about 10% lower than with the 300 L/ha back motor sprayer.

  compared with 300 L/ha BMS spray volume

• negative
  The lowest fungicide efficacy was recorded with UAV at 10 L/ha applied at high temperature (28°C).

cites 1 paper here

Control strategies: integrated analysis between adjuvants and spray volumes on the effectiveness of fungicides applied to wheat crops · 2026

• positive
  Adjuvants in fungicide sprays improve disease control in wheat compared with sprays without these products.

  compared with absence of these products