Paper · 2005 · Xibei Nong-Lin Keji Daxue xuebao. Ziran kexue ban

Effect of BTH on resistance induction in wheat against Blumeria graminis f.sp.tritici

Guorong Wei

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to study the ability of benzothiadiazole induced systemic acquired resistance in wheat against Blumeria graminis f.sp.tritici,wheat seedling and adult wheat were inoculated with B.graminis f.sp.tritici after pretreated with BTH.Suppression of the powdery mildew disease was observed in wheat pretreated with BTH.For wheat seedling,the optimum concentration of BTH for resistance induction was found to be at 0.20-0.25 mmol/L,the optimum interval between BTH induction and challenge inoculation was more than 6 days.The optimum treatment for adult wheat was spraying with 0.20 mmol/L BTH twice at tillering,through which the control effect was 60.82%,16% higher than that of the untreated.The results indicated that the BTH-induced resistance against the powdery mildew disease was a response to systemic acquired resistance,and BTH could be used to control powdery mildew in field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BTH pretreatment suppressed powdery mildew disease in wheat.

Treatment
BTHe1
Interactor
B.graminis f.sp.triticiBlumeria graminise0pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildew diseasee1
Direction
Suppressione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Blumeria graminis
Blumeria graminis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat seedling and adult wheat were inoculated with B.graminis f.sp.tritici after pretreated with BTH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–236 · show in text ↑
e1

“Suppression of the powdery mildew disease was observed in wheat pretreated with BTH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–320 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum BTH concentration for resistance induction in wheat seedlings was 0.20-0.25 mmol/L.

Organ / stage
wheat seedlinge0
Treatment
BTHe2
Outcome
optimum concentration of BTH for resistance inductione2
Value
0.20-0.25 mmol/Le2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat seedling and adult wheat were inoculated with B.graminis f.sp.tritici after pretreated with BTH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–236 · show in text ↑
e2

“the optimum concentration of BTH for resistance induction was found to be at 0.20-0.25 mmol/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–433 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum interval between BTH induction and challenge inoculation was more than 6 days.

Outcome
optimum interval between BTH induction and challenge inoculatione3
Value
more than 6 dayse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat seedling and adult wheat were inoculated with B.graminis f.sp.tritici after pretreated with BTH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–236 · show in text ↑
e3

“the optimum interval between BTH induction and challenge inoculation was more than 6 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying adult wheat with 0.20 mmol/L BTH twice at tillering gave a control effect of 60.82%.

Organ / stage
adult wheate0
Treatment
spraying with 0.20 mmol/L BTH twice at tilleringe4
Outcome
control effecte4
Value
60.82%e4
Comparator
the untreatede4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat seedling and adult wheat were inoculated with B.graminis f.sp.tritici after pretreated with BTH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–236 · show in text ↑
e4

“The optimum treatment for adult wheat was spraying with 0.20 mmol/L BTH twice at tillering,through which the control effect was 60.82%,16% higher than that of the untreated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control effect of BTH spraying on adult wheat was 16% higher than the untreated.

Organ / stage
adult wheate0
Treatment
spraying with 0.20 mmol/L BTH twice at tilleringe4
Outcome
control effecte4
Direction
highere4
Value
16%e4
Comparator
the untreatede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat seedling and adult wheat were inoculated with B.graminis f.sp.tritici after pretreated with BTH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–236 · show in text ↑
e4

“The optimum treatment for adult wheat was spraying with 0.20 mmol/L BTH twice at tillering,through which the control effect was 60.82%,16% higher than that of the untreated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–696 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

BTH-induced resistance to powdery mildew in wheat is a response to systemic acquired resistance.

Outcome
BTH-induced resistance against the powdery mildew diseasee5
Qualifier
a response to systemic acquired resistancee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat seedling and adult wheat were inoculated with B.graminis f.sp.tritici after pretreated with BTH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–236 · show in text ↑
e5

“the BTH-induced resistance against the powdery mildew disease was a response to systemic acquired resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–832 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

BTH could be used to control powdery mildew in wheat in the field.

Outcome
control powdery mildew in fielde6
Setting
fielde6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat seedling and adult wheat were inoculated with B.graminis f.sp.tritici after pretreated with BTH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–236 · show in text ↑
e6

“BTH could be used to control powdery mildew in field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–889 · show in text ↑

acibenzolar-S-methyl · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tillage · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.