Paper · 1969 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Initial and Residual Activity of Cidial (Phenthoate) Compared with that of Malathion and Lindane on Insects Affecting Stored Products1

Angelo Longoni; Giannantonio Michieli

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The initial activity of Cidial (phenthoate) (ethyl mercaptophenylacetate O, O-dimethyl phosphorodithioate) was compared with that of lindane and malathion on the following insects affecting stored products: Mediterranean flour moth, Anagasta huehniella (Zeller), larvae; khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium Everts, larvae; lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (F.), adults; saw-toothed grain beetle OryzaePhilus surinamensis (L.), adults; canfused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum Jacqueline duVal, larvae and adults; yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor L., larvae and adults; granary weevil, Sitophilus granaries (L.), adults; rice weevil, Sitophilus oriya (L.), adults. Cidial proved to be more effective than the other 2 products. Further tests were conducted to compare the residual activity of the 3 compounds. Cidial sprayed at 8 and 4 ppm on wheat gave almost complete control for at least I year of all species except T. granarium and A. kuehniella (poor control obtained after a few months). When applied at 2 ppm by spraying and at 4 ppm by dusting, this product provided almost complete control of T. confusum larvae and S. oryzae adults for I year and of some of the other species for a few months. Larvac;, used as a dust at 2 and 4 ppm, was fully effective for I year against R. dominica, S. granarius., and S. oryzae and for a few months against T. confusum larvae; its toxicity to all the other species was limited from the outset. Malathion sprayed at 8 ppm gave almost complete kill of T. confusum larvae and S. oryzae adults for 3 months and of S. granaries for 2 months. None of the insecticides affected the germination of the seeds to any extent for I year after treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cidial was more effective than lindane and malathion in initial activity against stored-product insects on wheat.

Treatment
Cidial (phenthoate)e3
Interactor
insects affecting stored productse3pest
Outcome
more effectivee2
Direction
more effectivee2
Comparator
lindane and malathione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cidial sprayed at 8 and 4 ppm on wheat gave almost complete control for at least I year of all species except T. granarium and A. kuehniella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–958 · show in text ↑
e3

“The initial activity of Cidial (phenthoate) (ethyl mercaptophenylacetate O, O-dimethyl phosphorodithioate) was compared with that of lindane and malathion on the following insects affecting stored products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cidial proved to be more effective than the other 2 products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cidial sprayed at 8 and 4 ppm on wheat gave almost complete control for at least one year of most stored-product insect species.

Treatment
Cidial sprayed at 8 and 4 ppme1
Interactor
insects affecting stored productse3pest
Outcome
almost complete controle1
Qualifier
for at least I yeare1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cidial sprayed at 8 and 4 ppm on wheat gave almost complete control for at least I year of all species except T. granarium and A. kuehniella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–958 · show in text ↑
e3

“The initial activity of Cidial (phenthoate) (ethyl mercaptophenylacetate O, O-dimethyl phosphorodithioate) was compared with that of lindane and malathion on the following insects affecting stored products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cidial applied at 2 ppm by spraying and at 4 ppm by dusting gave almost complete control of T. confusum larvae and S. oryzae adults for one year.

Treatment
applied at 2 ppm by spraying and at 4 ppm by dustinge4
Interactor
T. confusumTribolium confusume4pest
Second interactor
S. oryzaeSitophilus oryzaee4pest
Outcome
almost complete controle4
Qualifier
for I yeare4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tribolium confusum
Tribolium confusum · InteractorSarefo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitophilus oryzae
Sitophilus oryzae · Second interactorpicture taken by Olaf Leillinger · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cidial sprayed at 8 and 4 ppm on wheat gave almost complete control for at least I year of all species except T. granarium and A. kuehniella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–958 · show in text ↑
e4

“When applied at 2 ppm by spraying and at 4 ppm by dusting, this product provided almost complete control of T. confusum larvae and S. oryzae adults for I year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larvac, used as a dust at 2 and 4 ppm, was fully effective for one year against R. dominica and S. granarius and S. oryzae.

Treatment
used as a dust at 2 and 4 ppme5
Interactor
R. dominicaRhyzopertha dominicae5pest
Second interactor
S. granariusSitophilus granariuse5pest
Outcome
fully effectivee5
Qualifier
for I yeare5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhyzopertha dominica
Rhyzopertha dominica · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitophilus granarius
Sitophilus granarius · Second interactorSarefo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cidial sprayed at 8 and 4 ppm on wheat gave almost complete control for at least I year of all species except T. granarium and A. kuehniella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–958 · show in text ↑
e5

“Larvac;, used as a dust at 2 and 4 ppm, was fully effective for I year against R. dominica, S. granarius., and S. oryzae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malathion sprayed at 8 ppm gave almost complete kill of T. confusum larvae and S. oryzae adults for 3 months.

Treatment
Malathion sprayed at 8 ppme6
Interactor
T. confusumTribolium confusume6pest
Second interactor
S. oryzaeSitophilus oryzaee6pest
Outcome
almost complete kille6
Qualifier
for 3 monthse6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tribolium confusum
Tribolium confusum · InteractorSarefo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitophilus oryzae
Sitophilus oryzae · Second interactorpicture taken by Olaf Leillinger · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cidial sprayed at 8 and 4 ppm on wheat gave almost complete control for at least I year of all species except T. granarium and A. kuehniella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–958 · show in text ↑
e6

“Malathion sprayed at 8 ppm gave almost complete kill of T. confusum larvae and S. oryzae adults for 3 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the insecticides affected wheat seed germination for one year after treatment.

Treatment
the insecticidese7
Outcome
germination of the seedse7
Qualifier
for I year after treatmente7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cidial sprayed at 8 and 4 ppm on wheat gave almost complete control for at least I year of all species except T. granarium and A. kuehniella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–958 · show in text ↑
e7

“None of the insecticides affected the germination of the seeds to any extent for I year after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1696 · show in text ↑

insecticide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 10 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.