Paper · 2015 · Experimental Agriculture

THE EFFECT OF THREE YEARS OF TILLAGE AND POULTRY MANURE APPLICATION ON SOIL AND PLANT NUTRIENT COMPOSITION, GROWTH AND YIELD OF COCOYAM

ARUNA O. ADEKIYA; TAIWO M. AGBEDE; STEPHEN O. OJENIYI

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Tillage and use of organic manure are important agronomic practices that sustain high crop and soil productivity. Hence, a three-year (2007 to 2009) study was conducted to evaluate the effect of site, tillage and poultry manure (PM) treatments on soil and plant nutrients composition, growth and yield of cocoyam ( Xanthosoma sagittifolium ). The study was a 2 × 5 × 5 factorial experiment with two sites (Owo – site 1 and Obasooto – site 2), five tillage methods; manual clearing (MC), manual ridging (MR), manual mounding (MM), ploughing plus harrowing (P+H) and ploughing plus harrowing twice (P+2H) and five levels of PM (0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0 t ha −1 ). Treatments were replicated thrice. Soil OM, N, P, K, Ca, Mg and leaf nutrients reduced with increase in tillage intensity, thus MC conserved soil nutrients the most, and increased nutrient uptake. Soil and plant nutrient concentration was lowest under the P+2H treatment. The MC, MR and MM treatments led to faster growth and higher tuber yield. As PM increased from 0 to 10.0 t ha −1 soil pH, OM, soil and plant N, P, K, Ca and Mg increased. The 7.5 t ha −1 PM gave the highest leaf K, Ca and Mg values. Owo site had significantly higher yield and growth parameters of cocoyam compared with Obasooto site. Yield and growth parameters of cocoyam increased with increase in PM level up to 7.5 t ha −1 . Out of all tillage cum manure treatments, MC+7.5 t ha −1 PM gave the highest values of yield and growth parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing tillage intensity reduced soil and leaf nutrients.

Treatment
tillage intensitye0
Outcome
Soil OM, N, P, K, Ca, Mg and leaf nutrientse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil OM, N, P, K, Ca, Mg and leaf nutrients reduced with increase in tillage intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCOYAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual clearing conserved soil nutrients most and increased nutrient uptake.

Treatment
MCe0
Outcome
soil nutrientse0
Direction
conservede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MC conserved soil nutrients the most, and increased nutrient uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCOYAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual clearing increased nutrient uptake.

Treatment
MCe0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MC conserved soil nutrients the most, and increased nutrient uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCOYAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and plant nutrient concentration was lowest under P+2H.

Treatment
P+2H treatmente0
Outcome
Soil and plant nutrient concentratione0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil and plant nutrient concentration was lowest under the P+2H treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCOYAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MC, MR and MM led to faster cocoyam growth.

Treatment
MC, MR and MM treatmentse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
fastere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The MC, MR and MM treatments led to faster growth and higher tuber yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCOYAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MC, MR and MM led to higher cocoyam tuber yield.

Treatment
MC, MR and MM treatmentse0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The MC, MR and MM treatments led to faster growth and higher tuber yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCOYAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing poultry manure from 0 to 10.0 t ha −1 increased soil pH, OM, and soil and plant nutrients.

Treatment
PMe0
Outcome
soil pH, OM, soil and plant N, P, K, Ca and Mge0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.0 t ha −1e0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As PM increased from 0 to 10.0 t ha −1 soil pH, OM, soil and plant N, P, K, Ca and Mg increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCOYAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 7.5 t ha −1 poultry manure treatment gave the highest leaf K, Ca and Mg.

Treatment
7.5 t ha −1 PMe0
Outcome
leaf K, Ca and Mg valuese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 7.5 t ha −1 PM gave the highest leaf K, Ca and Mg values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCOYAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Owo had significantly higher cocoyam yield than Obasooto.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Obasooto sitee0
Setting
Owo sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Owo site had significantly higher yield and growth parameters of cocoyam compared with Obasooto site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1274 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Owo had significantly higher cocoyam growth parameters than Obasooto.

Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Obasooto sitee0
Setting
Owo sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Owo site had significantly higher yield and growth parameters of cocoyam compared with Obasooto site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cocoyam yield and growth increased with poultry manure up to 7.5 t ha −1.

Treatment
PM level up to 7.5 t ha −1e0
Outcome
Yield and growth parameterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and growth parameters of cocoyam increased with increase in PM level up to 7.5 t ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MC+7.5 t ha −1 PM gave the highest cocoyam yield and growth parameters.

Treatment
MC+7.5 t ha −1 PMe0
Outcome
yield and growth parameterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MC+7.5 t ha −1 PM gave the highest values of yield and growth parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“COCOYAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–135 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Colocasia esculenta (taro)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Colocasia esculenta (taro)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Colocasia esculenta (taro)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.