Paper · 2016 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Sowing Density: A Neglected Factor Fundamentally Affecting Root Distribution and Biomass Allocation of Field Grown Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)

Vera L. Hecht; Vicky M. Temperton; Kerstin A. Nagel; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
78
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Studies on the function of root traits and the genetic variation in these traits are often conducted under controlled conditions using individual potted plants. Little is known about root growth under field conditions and how root traits are affected by agronomic practices in particular sowing density. We hypothesized that with increasing sowing density, root length density (root length per soil volume, cm cm(-3)) increases in the topsoil as well as specific root length (root length per root dry weight, cm g(-1)) due to greater investment in fine roots. Therefore, we studied two spring barley cultivars at ten different sowing densities (24-340 seeds m(-2)) in 2 consecutive years in a clay loam field in Germany and established sowing density dose-response curves for several root and shoot traits. We took soil cores for measuring roots up to a depth of 60 cm in and between plant rows (inter-row distance 21 cm). Root length density increased with increasing sowing density and was greatest in the plant row in the topsoil (0-10 cm). Greater sowing density increased specific root length partly through greater production of fine roots in the topsoil. Rooting depth (D50) of the major root axes (root diameter class 0.4-1.0 mm) was not affected. Root mass fraction decreased, while stem mass fraction increased with sowing density and over time. Leaf mass fraction was constant over sowing density but greater leaf area was realized through increased specific leaf area. Considering fertilization, we assume that light competition caused plants to grow more shoot mass at the cost of investment into roots, which is partly compensated by increased specific root length and shallow rooting. Increased biomass per area with greater densities suggest that density increases the efficiency of the cropping system, however, declines in harvest index at densities over 230 plants m(-2) suggest that this efficiency did not translate into greater yield. We conclude that plant density is a modifier of root architecture and that root traits and their utility in breeding for greater productivity have to be understood in the context of high sowing densities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length density increased with sowing density and peaked in topsoil plant rows.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
sowing densitye0
Outcome
Root length densitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root length density increased with increasing sowing density and was greatest in the plant row in the topsoil (0-10 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater sowing density increased specific root length.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
sowing densitye0
Outcome
specific root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater sowing density increased specific root length partly through greater production of fine roots in the topsoil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater sowing density increased fine-root production.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
sowing densitye0
Outcome
production of fine rootse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater sowing density increased specific root length partly through greater production of fine roots in the topsoil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rooting depth of major axes was unaffected.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
Rooting depthe0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rooting depth (D50) of the major root axes (root diameter class 0.4-1.0 mm) was not affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root mass fraction declined with sowing density.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
sowing densitye0
Outcome
Root mass fractione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root mass fraction decreased, while stem mass fraction increased with sowing density and over time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem mass fraction rose with sowing density.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
sowing densitye0
Outcome
stem mass fractione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root mass fraction decreased, while stem mass fraction increased with sowing density and over time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf mass fraction stayed constant across sowing densities.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
sowing densitye0
Outcome
Leaf mass fractione0
Direction
constante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf mass fraction was constant over sowing density but greater leaf area was realized through increased specific leaf area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area increased.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
sowing densitye0
Outcome
specific leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf mass fraction was constant over sowing density but greater leaf area was realized through increased specific leaf area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass per area increased at greater density.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
densitye0
Outcome
biomass per areae0
Direction
Increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased biomass per area with greater densities suggest that density increases the efficiency of the cropping system, however, declines in harvest index at densities over 230 plants m(-2) suggest that this efficiency did not translate into greater yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index declined above 230 plants per square metre.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
densitye0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
declinese0
Qualifier
densities over 230 plants m(-2)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased biomass per area with greater densities suggest that density increases the efficiency of the cropping system, however, declines in harvest index at densities over 230 plants m(-2) suggest that this efficiency did not translate into greater yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–149 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend evaluating root traits for productivity breeding in high-density settings.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
root traits and their utility in breeding for greater productivity have to be understood in the context of high sowing densitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We conclude that plant density is a modifier of root architecture and that root traits and their utility in breeding for greater productivity have to be understood in the context of high sowing densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2161 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–149 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 16 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.