Paper · 2015 · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Fiber quality of upland cotton under different irrigation depths

Francisco P. Cordão Sobrinho; Hugo O. C. Guerra; Whéllyson P. Araújo; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
27
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACTAiming to evaluate the effect of irrigation depths on fiber quality of upland cotton, an experiment was conducted from July to December 2010 in Barbalha-CE, Brazil. The treatments consisted of a factorial combination of two upland cotton cultivars (BRS Aroeira and BRS Araripe) and five irrigation depths (260.93, 418.93, 514.21, 711.81 and 894.68 mm), arranged in a split-plot design with four replicates. A line-source sprinkler irrigation system was used and irrigation depth in the control treatment was calculated according to the crop evapotranspiration. The analysed fiber quality variables were: fiber percentage, length, uniformity, short-fiber index, resistance, elongation at rupture, micronaire index, maturity, degree of yellowing, reflectance degree and count strength product (CSP) index. The irrigation depths influenced fiber length, short-fiber index, strength, micronaire index, maturity and reflectance degree. The cultivars influenced fiber percentage, length and color (degree of yellowing). The best results of fiber quality were found with irrigation depths of 514.21 and 418.93 mm for the upland cotton cultivars BRS Araripe and BRS Aroeira, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation depths influenced fiber length, short-fiber index and strength.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
irrigation depthse0
Outcome
fiber length, short-fiber index, strengthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation depths influenced fiber length, short-fiber index, strength, micronaire index, maturity and reflectance degree.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation depths influenced micronaire, maturity and reflectance.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
irrigation depthse0
Outcome
micronaire index, maturity and reflectance degreee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The irrigation depths influenced fiber length, short-fiber index, strength, micronaire index, maturity and reflectance degree.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar influenced fiber percentage and length.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
fiber percentage, lengthe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivars influenced fiber percentage, length and color (degree of yellowing).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar influenced degree of yellowing.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
color (degree of yellowing)e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivars influenced fiber percentage, length and color (degree of yellowing).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRS Araripe had the best fiber quality at 514.21 mm irrigation.

Taxon
upland cottone0
Material
BRS Araripee0
Treatment
irrigation depths of 514.21e0
Outcome
fiber qualitye0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The best results of fiber quality were found with irrigation depths of 514.21 and 418.93 mm for the upland cotton cultivars BRS Araripe and BRS Aroeira, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRS Aroeira had the best fiber quality at 418.93 mm irrigation.

Taxon
upland cottone0
Material
BRS Aroeirae0
Treatment
418.93 mme0
Outcome
fiber qualitye0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The best results of fiber quality were found with irrigation depths of 514.21 and 418.93 mm for the upland cotton cultivars BRS Araripe and BRS Aroeira, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1188 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 73 positive, 61 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.