Intervention effectmodel-written summary

No significant difference in fibre length, fineness or uniformity index between 100 % and 75 % irrigation in 2005.

A claim from Effects of Deficit Drip Irrigation Ratios on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Fibre Quality · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant difference in fibre length, fineness or uniformity index between 100 % and 75 % irrigation in 2005.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
75 % irrigation levelse5
Outcome
fibre length, fineness, uniformity indexe5
Direction
no significant differencese5
Comparator
100 %e5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Deficit Drip Irrigation Ratios on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Fibre Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99
e5

“no significant differences in fibre length, fineness, uniformity index and elongation were detected between the 100 % and 75 % irrigation levels in 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–995

Title

Effects of Deficit Drip Irrigation Ratios on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Fibre Quality

H. Basal; N. Dagdelen; A. Unay; et al. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2008.00340.x

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-26cb67a4fb8c1e7e96b7c6c9026b0d3b3827d9fcb023cbabd7592c1d0889be33 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 73 positive, 61 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this claim · 73 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. negative

125 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.