Paper · 2023 · Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi

The effects of different irrigation levels and irrigation intervals on cotton cultivation: A study on yield, yield components, and fiber quality parameters

Ali Fuat Tarı; Serhat Satış; Sabri Akın

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

This study was conducted for investigating the impact of irrigation interval and deficit irrigation on seed cotton yield, fiber quality, and water productivity of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in the Şanlıurfa province of Türkiye during the years 2020 and 2021. The experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block design with split plots. The main plots included three irrigation intervals (D1: 4 day, D2: 8 day, and D3: 12 day), while the sub-plots consisted of three irrigation levels (I1: %150, I2: %120, and I3: %90) considered by Class A pan evaporation using the drip irrigation method. The study resulted in that the crop evapotranspiration varied from 693 to 1153 mm in 2020 and from 716 to 1126 mm in 2021, respectively. Irrigation interval and deficit irrigation had a statistically significant effect on seed cotton yield, seed cotton weight, and ginning outturn in both years of the study. The highest seed cotton yield, seed cotton weight, and lint yield were obtained from the treatment with a 4-day irrigation interval and irrigation water level at 150% (D1-I1), while the lowest values were obtained from the treatment with a 12-day irrigation interval and irrigation water level at 90% (D3-I3). However, irrigation interval and deficit irrigation did not have a statistically significant effect on 100-seed weight, fiber fineness, fiber length, and fiber strength in both years of the study. In the study, water use productivity (WP) ranged from 0.32 to 0.55 kg m-3, while irrigation water use productivity (IWP) ranged from 0.33 to 0.59 kg m-3, and similar results were obtained in both years of the research. According to the research findings, to achieve the highest cotton yield and quality, an irrigation interval of 4 days and a total seasonal irrigation water of 1062 mm are recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton evapotranspiration ranged from 693 to 1153 mm in 2020.

Outcome
crop evapotranspiratione0
Value
693 to 1153 mme0
Qualifier
2020e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop evapotranspiration varied from 693 to 1153 mm in 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton evapotranspiration ranged from 716 to 1126 mm in 2021.

Outcome
crop evapotranspiratione0
Value
716 to 1126 mme0
Qualifier
2021e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop evapotranspiration varied from 693 to 1153 mm in 2020 and from 716 to 1126 mm in 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation interval and deficit irrigation significantly affected cotton seed yield, seed weight, and ginning outturn in both years.

Treatment
Irrigation interval and deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
seed cotton yield, seed cotton weight, and ginning outturne0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation interval and deficit irrigation had a statistically significant effect on seed cotton yield, seed cotton weight, and ginning outturn in both years of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4-day interval at 150% irrigation gave the highest cotton seed yield, seed weight, and lint yield.

Treatment
4-day irrigation interval and irrigation water level at 150% (D1-I1)e0
Outcome
seed cotton yield, seed cotton weight, and lint yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed cotton yield, seed cotton weight, and lint yield were obtained from the treatment with a 4-day irrigation interval and irrigation water level at 150% (D1-I1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 12-day interval at 90% irrigation gave the lowest cotton seed yield, seed weight, and lint yield.

Treatment
12-day irrigation interval and irrigation water level at 90% (D3-I3)e0
Outcome
seed cotton yield, seed cotton weight, and lint yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed cotton yield, seed cotton weight, and lint yield were obtained from the treatment with a 4-day irrigation interval and irrigation water level at 150% (D1-I1), while the lowest values were obtained from the treatment with a 12-day irrigation interval and irrigation water level at 90% (D3-I3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation factors did not significantly affect cotton 100-seed weight, fiber fineness, length or strength.

Treatment
irrigation interval and deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
100-seed weight, fiber fineness, fiber length, and fiber strengthe0
Direction
did not have a statistically significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation interval and deficit irrigation did not have a statistically significant effect on 100-seed weight, fiber fineness, fiber length, and fiber strength in both years of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1419 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton water use productivity ranged from 0.32 to 0.55 kg m-3.

Outcome
water use productivity (WP)e0
Value
0.32 to 0.55 kg m-3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use productivity (WP) ranged from 0.32 to 0.55 kg m-3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1494 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton irrigation water use productivity ranged from 0.33 to 0.59 kg m-3.

Outcome
irrigation water use productivity (IWP)e0
Value
0.33 to 0.59 kg m-3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation water use productivity (IWP) ranged from 0.33 to 0.59 kg m-3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a 4-day irrigation interval and 1062 mm total seasonal water for maximum cotton yield and quality.

Outcome
an irrigation interval of 4 days and a total seasonal irrigation water of 1062 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to achieve the highest cotton yield and quality, an irrigation interval of 4 days and a total seasonal irrigation water of 1062 mm are recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1822 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 73 positive, 61 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.