Paper · 2016 · Journal of Applied Entomology

Differential susceptibility and suitability of domestic and wild apple species for a florivorous weevil and its parasitoids

A. K. Knuff; E. Obermaier; K. Mody

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Crop plant domestication can change plant resistance to herbivores leading to differences in pest pressure experienced by crop plants and their wild relatives. To compare resistance to herbivores between domesticated and wild fruit trees, we quantified direct resistance and indirect resistance to a pest insect, the florivorous apple blossom weevil Anthonomus pomorum (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), for the cultivated apple Malus domestica and two wild apple species, the European crab apple M. sylvestris and the exotic M. kirghisorum . We measured weevil infestation and performance (weight, sex ratio), and weevil parasitism by parasitoid wasps for different cultivars of M. domestica and for the two wild apple species. To explain weevil and parasitoid responses to different apple species, we quantified tree characteristics including nitrogen content, size of flower buds, bark roughness, tree size, tree phenology and tree position. We found significant differences in susceptibility to weevil infestation between apple species, with lowest infestation (highest apple resistance) in M. domestica and highest infestation in M. kirghisorum . The suitability of apple species also varied significantly: weevils emerging from M. sylvestris were significantly lighter than those from M. kirghisorum . Parasitism of A. pomorum by different parasitoid species was significantly higher in M. sylvestris than in M. domestica . Infestation, weevil weight and parasitism were positively related to tree characteristics: infestation to bud nitrogen content and bark roughness, weevil size to nitrogen content and bud size, and parasitism to tree height and bud density. Our study revealed marked differences between apple species in susceptibility and suitability for the pest herbivore, but also for antagonistic parasitoids. Whereas direct resistance appeared to be higher in cultivated apple, indirect resistance via parasitoids was apparently higher in wild apple trees. Our findings suggest that wild and cultivated apple trees possess different resistance traits that may be combined to optimize resistance in commercial apple cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weevil infestation differed significantly among apples, lowest in M. domestica and highest in M. kirghisorum.

Taxon
apple speciesMalus domesticae0
Material
M. domesticae0
Interactor
weevile0pest
Outcome
weevil infestatione0
Direction
lowest infestatione0
Comparator
M. kirghisorume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We found significant differences in susceptibility to weevil infestation between apple species, with lowest infestation (highest apple resistance) in M. domestica and highest infestation in M. kirghisorum .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1154 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weevils emerging from M. sylvestris were significantly lighter than those from M. kirghisorum.

Taxon
M. sylvestrisMalus sylvestrise0
Interactor
weevilsCurculionidaee0pest
Outcome
weevils emerginge0
Direction
lightere0
Comparator
M. kirghisorume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus sylvestris
Malus sylvestris · TaxonPer Arvid Åsen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weevils emerging from M. sylvestris were significantly lighter than those from M. kirghisorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1308 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitism of the weevil was significantly higher in M. sylvestris than in M. domestica.

Taxon
M. sylvestrisMalus sylvestrise0
Interactor
A. pomorumAnthonomus pomorume0pest
Second interactor
parasitoid speciese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Parasitism of A. pomorume0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
M. domesticae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus sylvestris
Malus sylvestris · TaxonPer Arvid Åsen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Anthonomus pomorum
Anthonomus pomorum · InteractorSascha Nunheim · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Parasitism of A. pomorum by different parasitoid species was significantly higher in M. sylvestris than in M. domestica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1430 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation was positively related to bud nitrogen content and bark roughness.

Taxon
treee1
Organ / stage
bude0
Interactor
weevile1pest
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
positively relatede1

Verbatim

e0

“infestation to bud nitrogen content and bark roughness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1578 · show in text ↑
e1

“Infestation, weevil weight and parasitism were positively related to tree characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1522 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weevil size was positively related to nitrogen content and bud size.

Taxon
treee1
Organ / stage
bude0
Interactor
weevile0pest
Outcome
weevil sizee0
Direction
positively relatede1

Verbatim

e0

“weevil size to nitrogen content and bud size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1624 · show in text ↑
e1

“Infestation, weevil weight and parasitism were positively related to tree characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1522 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitism was positively related to tree height and bud density.

Taxon
treee0
Organ / stage
bude0
Interactor
weevile1pest
Outcome
parasitisme0
Direction
positively relatede1

Verbatim

e0

“parasitism to tree height and bud density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1671 · show in text ↑
e1

“Infestation, weevil weight and parasitism were positively related to tree characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1522 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that direct resistance is higher in cultivated apple.

Material
cultivated applee0
Outcome
direct resistancee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“direct resistance appeared to be higher in cultivated apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1838–1897 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that indirect resistance via parasitoids is higher in wild apple trees.

Interactor
parasitoidse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
indirect resistancee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indirect resistance via parasitoids was apparently higher in wild apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–1976 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest combining resistance traits from wild and cultivated apples for commercial cultivars.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Outcome
combined to optimize resistance in commercial apple cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wild and cultivated apple trees possess different resistance traits that may be combined to optimize resistance in commercial apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2004–2145 · show in text ↑