Paper · 2003 · Acta Horticulturae

INFLUENCE OF PLANT POPULATION ON TRANSPLANTED PROCESSING TOMATOES IN THE LOWER SACRAMENTO VALLEY

G. Miyao

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Use of transplants in processing tomatoes is increasing within California, while targeted plant populations vary widely. The purpose of the field trial was to determine optimum plant populations. The trial design was a randomized complete block with 6 replications in a commercial field. An evaluation of processing tomato transplant populations of in-row spacing of 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70 cm indicated marketable yields increased with lower plant populations. Marketable yield increased from 74 to 86 tons per hectare, correlated to a positive linear response to wider spacing. Fruit color and °Brix were negatively impacted, especially as distances exceeded 50 cm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider transplant spacing increased marketable tomato yield from 74 to 86 tons per hectare.

Taxon
PROCESSING TOMATOESe1
Treatment
wider spacinge0
Outcome
Marketable yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
74 to 86 tons per hectaree0
Comparator
lower plant populationse0

Verbatim

e0

“processing tomato transplant populations of in-row spacing of 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70 cm indicated marketable yields increased with lower plant populations. Marketable yield increased from 74 to 86 tons per hectare, correlated to a positive linear response to wider spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–580 · show in text ↑
e1

“INFLUENCE OF PLANT POPULATION ON TRANSPLANTED PROCESSING TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit color declined with wider spacing, particularly above 50 cm.

Taxon
PROCESSING TOMATOESe1
Treatment
distances exceeded 50 cme0
Outcome
Fruit colore0
Direction
negatively impactede0
Qualifier
especially as distances exceeded 50 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit color and °Brix were negatively impacted, especially as distances exceeded 50 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–668 · show in text ↑
e1

“PROCESSING TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit °Brix declined with wider spacing, particularly above 50 cm.

Taxon
PROCESSING TOMATOESe1
Treatment
distances exceeded 50 cme0
Outcome
°Brixe0
Direction
negatively impactede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit color and °Brix were negatively impacted, especially as distances exceeded 50 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–668 · show in text ↑
e1

“PROCESSING TOMATOES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–65 · show in text ↑

density · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.