Paper · 2016 · Advances in Applied Research

Changes in available nitrogen, grain yield and nutrient uptake under varied levels of nitrogen applied to different nitrogen fertility gradient strips in finger millet crop

D.V. Naveen; R.C. Gowda; C.A. Srinivasamurty; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiment was carried out at Gandhi Krishi Vigyan Kendra (GKVK) to study the effect of graded levels of nitrogen to soils with different nitrogen fertility gradients on growth and yield of Finger millet (GPU 28) and its soil properties during Kharif 2010 and 2011. Treatment comprised of T, (Absolute control), T2 [RDF(Recommended Dose of Fertilizer) + FYM (Farm Yard Manure)], T3 (RDF alone), T4[125% RDN (Recommended Dose of Nitrogen) + RDPK (Recommended Dose of PK) + FYM)], T5 (125% RDN + RDPK), T6 (150% RDN + RDPK + FYM), T7 (150% RDN + RDPK) and artificially created five nitrogen fertility gradient strips from very low N fertility gradient strip to very high N fertility gradient strip (No to N4). Soil application of T4 recorded maximum yield (29.56 qha"1) as compared to other treatments. With respect to gradient strips maximum grain yield of (31.47 q ha"1) was recorded in very high nitrogen fertility strip (N4) followed by soil treatment with T6 (150% RDN + RDPK + FYM). Increased doses of N application in this soil condition did not benefit the crop and yield remained lower. The maximum NPK uptake was observed on T4 (125% RDN + RDPK + FYM) application irrespective of fertility gradient strips and was followed by application of treatment T6 (150% RDN + RDPK + FYM)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave maximum finger millet yield of 29.56 qha"1 against other treatments.

Taxon
finger millet cropEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
29.56 qha"1e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–172 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil application of T4 recorded maximum yield (29.56 qha"1) as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–805 · show in text ↑
e1

“T4[125% RDN (Recommended Dose of Nitrogen) + RDPK (Recommended Dose of PK) + FYM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–482 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The very high nitrogen fertility strip N4 yielded maximum grain yield of 31.47 q ha"1.

Taxon
finger millet cropEleusine coracanat0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
31.47 q ha"1e0
Comparator
T6e0
Setting
very high nitrogen fertility strip (N4)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–172 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum grain yield of (31.47 q ha"1) was recorded in very high nitrogen fertility strip (N4) followed by soil treatment with T6 (150% RDN + RDPK + FYM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N doses in this soil condition did not benefit finger millet and yield stayed lower.

Taxon
finger millet cropEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Increased doses of N applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
this soil conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–172 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increased doses of N application in this soil condition did not benefit the crop and yield remained lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave maximum NPK uptake irrespective of fertility gradient strips, followed by T6.

Taxon
finger millet cropEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
T4 (125% RDN + RDPK + FYM)e0
Outcome
NPK uptakee0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
irrespective of fertility gradient stripse0
Comparator
T6 (150% RDN + RDPK + FYM)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“finger millet crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–172 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum NPK uptake was observed on T4 (125% RDN + RDPK + FYM) application irrespective of fertility gradient strips and was followed by application of treatment T6 (150% RDN + RDPK + FYM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1291 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 57 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.