Abstract
Abstract Seed of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. ‘Champion’ and Petunia hybrida Vilm. ‘Snow Cloud’ were irrigated with either nonacidified solution (0.15, 0.30, or 0.45 ml) of 75% H 3 PO 4 ·liter −1 ; or 0.11, 0.20, or 0.26 ml of 46.5% H 2 SO 4 ·liter −1 . Germination was not affected by acidification, yet seedling growth was enhanced for both species. Growing medium and plant shoots were analyzed for N, P, K, Ca, and Mg content. Although nutrient levels were affected by acidification, no nutrient deficiency or phytotoxicity due to irrigation water acidification was evident.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato germination was not affected by acidified irrigation water.
- Taxon
- Lycopersicon esculentum
Solanum lycopersicume2 - Treatment
- acidificatione1
- Outcome
- Germinatione1
- Direction
- not affectede1
- Comparator
- nonacidified solutione6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Germination was not affected by acidification, yet seedling growth was enhanced for both species”
e2“Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”
e6“irrigated with either nonacidified solution”
Claim · model-written summary
Petunia germination was not affected by acidified irrigation water.
- Taxon
- Petunia hybrida
Petunia ×hybridae3 - Treatment
- acidificatione1
- Outcome
- Germinatione1
- Direction
- not affectede1
- Comparator
- nonacidified solutione6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Germination was not affected by acidification, yet seedling growth was enhanced for both species”
e3“Petunia hybrida Vilm.”
e6“irrigated with either nonacidified solution”
Claim · model-written summary
Acidified irrigation water enhanced tomato seedling growth.
- Taxon
- Lycopersicon esculentum
Solanum lycopersicume2 - Treatment
- acidificatione1
- Outcome
- seedling growthe1
- Direction
- enhancede1
- Comparator
- nonacidified solutione6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Germination was not affected by acidification, yet seedling growth was enhanced for both species”
e2“Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”
e6“irrigated with either nonacidified solution”
Claim · model-written summary
Acidified irrigation water enhanced petunia seedling growth.
- Taxon
- Petunia hybrida
Petunia ×hybridae3 - Treatment
- acidificatione1
- Outcome
- seedling growthe1
- Direction
- enhancede1
- Comparator
- nonacidified solutione6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Germination was not affected by acidification, yet seedling growth was enhanced for both species”
e3“Petunia hybrida Vilm.”
e6“irrigated with either nonacidified solution”
Claim · model-written summary
Acidified irrigation water affected nutrient levels in tomato seedlings.
- Taxon
- Lycopersicon esculentum
Solanum lycopersicume2 - Treatment
- acidificatione4
- Outcome
- nutrient levelse4
- Direction
- affectede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e4“Although nutrient levels were affected by acidification, no nutrient deficiency or phytotoxicity due to irrigation water acidification was evident”
e2“Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”
Claim · model-written summary
Acidified irrigation water affected nutrient levels in petunia seedlings.
- Taxon
- Petunia hybrida
Petunia ×hybridae3 - Treatment
- acidificatione4
- Outcome
- nutrient levelse4
- Direction
- affectede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e4“Although nutrient levels were affected by acidification, no nutrient deficiency or phytotoxicity due to irrigation water acidification was evident”
e3“Petunia hybrida Vilm.”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water acidification caused no phytotoxicity in tomato.
- Taxon
- Lycopersicon esculentum
Solanum lycopersicume2 - Treatment
- irrigation water acidificatione4
- Outcome
- phytotoxicitye4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e4“no nutrient deficiency or phytotoxicity due to irrigation water acidification was evident”
e2“Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water acidification caused no phytotoxicity in petunia.
- Taxon
- Petunia hybrida
Petunia ×hybridae3 - Treatment
- irrigation water acidificatione4
- Outcome
- phytotoxicitye4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e4“no nutrient deficiency or phytotoxicity due to irrigation water acidification was evident”
e3“Petunia hybrida Vilm.”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · crop injury · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
ph · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →ph · growth · Petunia x hybrida (garden petunia)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
ph · crop injury · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.