Paper · 2016 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of Micronutrients Soil Supplementation on Sugarcane in Different Production Environments: Cane Plant Cycle

Estêvão Vicari Mellis; José Antonio Quaggio; Gustavo Ricardo Gonçalves Becari; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fertilization of sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.) with micronutrients is not common and this can affect crop yield. Research results of micronutrients in sugarcane in Brazil are still scarce and inconclusive. The aim of the present study was to assess the sugarcane crop response to Cu, Zn, Mn, Mo, and B fertilization in different sugarcane production environments in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. An experiment was conducted at 11 locations. The treatments consisted of the application of fixed micronutrient doses only to the planting furrow as follows: control, Zn (10 kg ha −1 ), Mn (10 kg ha −1 ), Cu (10 kg ha −1 ), B (3 kg ha −1 ), Mo (2 kg ha −1 ), and complete (Zn +Mn + Cu + B +Mo). The design consisted of a randomized block with five replicates. The leaf content, tillering, sugarcane yield, and total recoverable sugar were determined in cane plant. The responses varied with location, soil type, climate, and variety. Positive responses to micronutrients application were observed in all parameters studied with the exception of total recoverable sugar. The sugarcane yield increased significantly with the application of micronutrients in the following order of magnitude: Zn > Mo = Mn > Cu > B = Complete, with yield gain of 18, 12, 12, 10, 9, and 9 tonnes of cane per hectare (TCH), respectively. Sugarcane responded positively to micronutrient, especially Zn fertilization, demonstrating that this practice may be economically viable and increase the productivity of Brazilian sugarcane fields, making agribusiness sugarcane more sustainable. Micronutrients can increase sugarcane yield. Zinc is the principal micronutrient to sugarcane producer. The application of high doses of micronutrients may increase the productivity of sugarcane Brazilians.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient responses varied by location, soil type, climate and variety.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
responsese0
Qualifier
location, soil type, climate, and varietye0

Verbatim

e0

“The responses varied with location, soil type, climate, and variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–928 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrients improved studied parameters except total recoverable sugar.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
micronutrients applicatione0
Outcome
all parameters studied with the exception of total recoverable sugare0
Direction
Positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Positive responses to micronutrients application were observed in all parameters studied with the exception of total recoverable sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc increased sugarcane yield by 18 tonnes of cane per hectare.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
sugarcane yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The sugarcane yield increased significantly with the application of micronutrients in the following order of magnitude: Zn > Mo = Mn > Cu > B = Complete, with yield gain of 18, 12, 12, 10, 9, and 9 tonnes of cane per hectare (TCH), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–58 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.