Paper · 2008

Contrasting Responses of Weed Communities and Crops to 12 Years of Tillage and Fertilization Treatments

Agri-Food Canada

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Minimizing inputs such as fertilizers, herbicides, or tillage may be sought by producers to satisfy economic as well as environmental goals. One of the challenges in reducing inputs, whether synthetic fertilizers or herbicides, or substituting a synthetic nutrient with an organic source, is to identify practices that will provide optimum growing conditions for the crop while maintaining an adequate level of weed control. Our objective was to measure the cumulative effects of 12 yr of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilization treatments applied to two tillage systems [conventional tillage (CT) vs. no tillage (NT)] in a corn–soybean rotation on weed communities and crop yields. Residual (postherbicide treatment) weed species assembly was determined by multivariate analysis and was influenced mainly by tillage, with weeds more strongly associated with NT than with CT. Diversity of weed communities as measured by richness, evenness (E ), and a diversity index (H9), and total weed biomass were greater for NT than for CT. Nutrient treatments had little or no effect on these parameters. Corn yields were reduced by 70% in the absence of N and by 25% in NT compared to CT treatments. Soybean yields were reduced in NT with increasing P rates compared to other treatments, but reductions never exceeded 10%. Overall, corn and soybean had different responses to treatments, with corn yields being far more affected by fertilization and tillage than soybean yields. Conversely, the absence of tillage had a much greater effect than the absence of nutrient input on weed community assembly and biomass, suggesting the importance of a weed management program specifically tailored for NT systems. Nomenclature: Corn, Zea mays L.; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed assembly was influenced mainly by tillage.

Taxon
Cropst0
Treatment
tillagee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed species assemblye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Residual (postherbicide treatment) weed species assembly was determined by multivariate analysis and was influenced mainly by tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds were more strongly associated with no tillage than conventional tillage.

Taxon
Cropst0
Treatment
NTe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weeds more strongly associatede0
Direction
more stronglye0
Comparator
CTe0

Verbatim

e0

“weeds more strongly associated with NT than with CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed diversity and biomass were greater under no tillage.

Taxon
Cropst0
Treatment
NTe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
Diversity of weed communities as measured by richness, evenness (E ), and a diversity index (H9), and total weed biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
CTe0

Verbatim

e0

“Diversity of weed communities as measured by richness, evenness (E ), and a diversity index (H9), and total weed biomass were greater for NT than for CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient treatments had little or no effect on weed diversity and biomass.

Taxon
Cropst0
Treatment
Nutrient treatmentse0
Outcome
these parameterse0
Direction
little or no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient treatments had little or no effect on these parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield fell 70% without nitrogen.

Treatment
absence of Ne0
Outcome
Corn yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields were reduced by 70% in the absence of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield fell 25% under no tillage versus conventional tillage.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
Corn yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
CT treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields were reduced by 70% in the absence of N and by 25% in NT compared to CT treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1195 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield declined under no tillage as phosphorus rates rose, by no more than 10%.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
increasing P ratese0
Outcome
Soybean yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean yields were reduced in NT with increasing P rates compared to other treatments, but reductions never exceeded 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1318 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend weed management tailored to no-tillage systems.

Taxon
Cropst0
Outcome
a weed management program specifically tailored for NT systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting the importance of a weed management program specifically tailored for NT systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.