Paper · 2016 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Field performance of cultivars of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) under cultivar-specific seed priming

A D SHARMA; S V S RATHORE; KALYANI SRINIVASAN; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Seeds of three cultivars of okra (cv. A-4, Phule Utkarsha and VRO-6) were subjected to four seed priming methods, namely, hydropriming, osmopriming, halopriming and solid matrix (SM) priming comprising a total of 18 treatments of different priming combinations along with control. The observations of selected physiological parameters - seed germination, seedling vigour, vigour index, and field performance of three cultivars were recorded. Cultivar- specificity with reference to priming treatment was observed. On the basis of data recorded for the above parameters, hydropriming for 18 hr for cv. A-4, halopriming with 1% CaCl2 for 6 hr for cv. VRO-6 and SM priming with calcium aluminium silicate (1:0.4:1; Seed : SM : Water) for 48 hr for cv. Phule Utkarsha were found to be the most beneficial which could increase the fruit yield up to 20-104% in the three tested cultivars. The experiment underscored that to harness maximum benefit of seed priming for best field performance, cultivar-specific priming treatment should be adopted.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra cultivars differed in response to priming.

Outcome
Cultivar- specificity with reference to priming treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar- specificity with reference to priming treatment was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–513 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eighteen-hour hydropriming was most beneficial for A-4 and increased fruit yield within a 20–104% range across cultivars.

Material
cv. A-4e0
Treatment
hydropriming for 18 hre0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
20-104%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydropriming for 18 hr for cv. A-4, halopriming with 1% CaCl2 for 6 hr for cv. VRO-6 and SM priming with calcium aluminium silicate (1:0.4:1; Seed : SM : Water) for 48 hr for cv. Phule Utkarsha were found to be the most beneficial which could increase the fruit yield up to 20-104% in the three tested cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six-hour CaCl2 halopriming was most beneficial for VRO-6.

Material
cv. VRO-6e0
Treatment
halopriming with 1% CaCl2 for 6 hre0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“halopriming with 1% CaCl2 for 6 hr for cv. VRO-6 and SM priming with calcium aluminium silicate (1:0.4:1; Seed : SM : Water) for 48 hr for cv. Phule Utkarsha were found to be the most beneficial which could increase the fruit yield up to 20-104% in the three tested cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forty-eight-hour solid matrix priming was most beneficial for Phule Utkarsha.

Material
cv. Phule Utkarshae0
Treatment
SM priming with calcium aluminium silicate (1:0.4:1; Seed : SM : Water) for 48 hre0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SM priming with calcium aluminium silicate (1:0.4:1; Seed : SM : Water) for 48 hr for cv. Phule Utkarsha were found to be the most beneficial which could increase the fruit yield up to 20-104% in the three tested cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend cultivar-specific priming for maximum field performance.

Outcome
cultivar-specific priming treatment should be adoptede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to harness maximum benefit of seed priming for best field performance, cultivar-specific priming treatment should be adopted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–63 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    T6 with 0.5 percent calcium chloride gave the highest fruit weight, statistically on par with T5 and T7.

    Effects of Organic Calcium Sources and Calcium Nutrition on Growth, Yield, and Quality of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L Moench) · 2025 · compared with T5(KAU POP + foliar spray of one percent calcium nitrate) and T7 (KAU POP + foliar spray of 0.5 percent calcium acetate)

    Same direction

See all 2 papers →

aluminium atom · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicate(4-) · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium atom · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.