Paper · 2020 · Direct Research Journal of Agriculture and Food Science

The Effect of Calcium and Magnesium on the Growth and Yield of Okra (Abelmoschus esulentus L.) through Foliar Application

G. H. Tan; M. A. S. Kamsol; P.S. H. Tony

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Foliar fertilization is a popular practice for supplying mineral nutrients to the crops, especially under conditions of limited availability of soil nutrients. This study hypothesized that the foliar nutrients application can enhance the growth and yield of okra. The experiment was conducted at Complex Field 10, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, and laid out as Randomized Completely Block Design (RCBD) with four treatments and six replications. The treatments consist of Treatment 1 (T1): Foliar (calcium and magnesium); Treatment 2 (T2): NPK 15:15:15; Treatment 3 (T3): Foliar (calcium and magnesium plus NPK 15:15:15), and Treatment 4: Control. The foliar were sprayed with 2% on the leaf every 2 weeks and the fertilizer was spread around the crop. The data were recorded by measuring (i) the plant height (4 weeks interval); (ii) fruit yield (until 120 DAP); (iii) days of flowering (from 1 DAP); (iv) number of fruits and (v) branches per plant (until 120 DAP). Soil analyses were conducted before and after the experiment. All the parameters measured were analyzed using ANOVA and mean separations of LSD test using SAS 9.0 with p < 0.05. This study concluded that T3 showed the highest growth rate and yield as compared to other treatments. There was a significant difference between T1 and T2, where T2 showed prominent results. Therefore, it was concluded that fertilizer (NPK) cannot be substituted with foliar nutrients (calcium and magnesium), it can only supplement the current application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined foliar calcium-magnesium and NPK treatment had the highest okra growth rate.

Treatment
Foliar (calcium and magnesium plus NPK 15:15:15)e0
Outcome
growth ratee1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatment 3 (T3): Foliar (calcium and magnesium plus NPK 15:15:15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“T3 showed the highest growth rate and yield as compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined foliar calcium-magnesium and NPK treatment had the highest okra yield.

Treatment
Foliar (calcium and magnesium plus NPK 15:15:15)e0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatment 3 (T3): Foliar (calcium and magnesium plus NPK 15:15:15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“T3 showed the highest growth rate and yield as compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK treatment gave significantly better results than foliar nutrients alone.

Treatment
NPK 15:15:15e0
Outcome
prominent resultse1
Direction
prominente1
Comparator
Foliar (calcium and magnesium)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatment 1 (T1): Foliar (calcium and magnesium); Treatment 2 (T2): NPK 15:15:15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–572 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a significant difference between T1 and T2, where T2 showed prominent results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1357 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded that foliar calcium and magnesium supplement rather than substitute for NPK.

Outcome
it can only supplement the current applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“fertilizer (NPK) cannot be substituted with foliar nutrients (calcium and magnesium), it can only supplement the current application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1524 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

magnesium atom · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium atom · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium atom · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 75 positive, 2 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

application · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 112 positive, 3 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

fertilization · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 190 positive, 17 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

203 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.