Paper · 2018 · GEMA AGRO

Peningkatan Hasil Tanaman Okra Dengan Pemberian Pupuk Kompos dan NPK

Made Sri Yuliartini; Ketut Agung Sudewa; Luh Kartini; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the effect of compost and NPK Phonska fertilizer application to the growth and yield of okra plants, and to get optimum dose. This research was conducted in experimental garden of Agricultural Faculty of Warmadewa University. The design used in this research is factorial randomized block design (RAK) consisting of two treatments: compost fertilizer and NPK Phonska fertilizer. The interaction treatment between doses of compost fertilizer with NPK Phosnka and single treatment of NPK Phonska have no significant effect on all observed variables. The treatment of compost fertilizer dosage have no significant to effect foe leaf number and dry weight of oven fruit, but it had significant effect to the weight of fresh and dried weight of oven stover and very significant effect on the variables of plant height, the number of fruit and the weight of fresh fruit. The dosage of compost fertilizer 8 ton ha-1 to got the highest fresh weight of fruit per plant which is 380,42 g, an increase of 44,05% if compared with the lowest fresh fruit weight per plant obtained in the treatment without compost 0 tons ha- ˡ of 264.08 g. The results of the distribution of NPK Phonska at different doses have no significant effect on one another . However, , the highest fresh fruit weight was obtained at NPK treatment at 400 kg ha-1 treatment ie 351,75g. This increased by 7.02% when compared with the freshest weight of lowest fruit obtained at 200 kg ha-1 treatment ie 328,67 g.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The compost-by-NPK interaction had no significant effect on observed variables.

Treatment
interaction treatment between doses of compost fertilizer with NPK Phosnkae0
Outcome
all observed variablese0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction treatment between doses of compost fertilizer with NPK Phosnka and single treatment of NPK Phonska have no significant effect on all observed variables.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK Phonska alone had no significant effect on observed variables.

Treatment
single treatment of NPK Phonskae0
Outcome
all observed variablese0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction treatment between doses of compost fertilizer with NPK Phosnka and single treatment of NPK Phonska have no significant effect on all observed variables.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost dose had no significant effect on leaf number or oven-dried fruit weight.

Treatment
compost fertilizer dosagee0
Outcome
leaf number and dry weight of oven fruite0
Direction
no significant to effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of compost fertilizer dosage have no significant to effect foe leaf number and dry weight of oven fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost dose significantly affected fresh and oven-dried stover weight.

Outcome
weight of fresh and dried weight of oven stovere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it had significant effect to the weight of fresh and dried weight of oven stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost dose very significantly affected plant height, fruit number and fresh fruit weight.

Outcome
plant height, the number of fruit and the weight of fresh fruite0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“very significant effect on the variables of plant height, the number of fruit and the weight of fresh fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost at 8 ton ha-1 produced the highest fresh fruit weight, 380,42 g per plant, 44,05% above no compost.

Treatment
compost fertilizer 8 ton ha-1e0
Outcome
fresh weight of fruit per plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
380,42 ge0
Qualifier
44,05%e0
Comparator
treatment without compost 0 tons ha- ˡe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The dosage of compost fertilizer 8 ton ha-1 to got the highest fresh weight of fruit per plant which is 380,42 g, an increase of 44,05% if compared with the lowest fresh fruit weight per plant obtained in the treatment without compost 0 tons ha- ˡ of 264.08 g.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK at 400 kg ha-1 had highest fresh fruit weight, 351,75g, 7.02% above 200 kg ha-1.

Treatment
NPK treatment at 400 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
fresh fruit weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
351,75ge0
Qualifier
7.02%e0
Comparator
200 kg ha-1 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest fresh fruit weight was obtained at NPK treatment at 400 kg ha-1 treatment ie 351,75g. This increased by 7.02% when compared with the freshest weight of lowest fruit obtained at 200 kg ha-1 treatment ie 328,67 g.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 190 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 190 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

203 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.