Paper · 2010 · Nigerian Journal of Horticultural Science

Growth, Dry Matter Partitioning and Yield Components of Okra Under Organic and Inorganic Sources of Nitrogens

W.B Akanbi; A.O Togun; J.A Adediran; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pot and field experiments were conducted at the Institute of Agricultural Research and Training, Ibadan, Nigeria between 2004 and 2006 to determine the response of okra to organic and inorganic sources of nitrogen (N). In the pot experiment, okra varieties NHAe 47-4 was nourished with four N levels: 0, 25, 50 and 75 kg N hasup>-1 and five compost rates: 0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and 6.0 Mg hasup>-1; while in the field experiment the same variety of okra was fertilized with three N levels 0, 25 and 75 kg N hasup>-1 and four compost rates: 0, 2, 3 and 4.0 Mg hasup>-1. Both pot and field experiments were factorial fitted into a randomized complete block design with three replicates. Data were collected on growth parameters, dry matter production and partitioning as well as marketable fresh fruit yield. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and significant means were compared using Duncan's multiple range test (p-1 gave the highest fresh fruit yield value of 11.46 Mg hasup>-1 although, not significantly different from 11.41 and 11.44 Mg ha,sup>-1 fruit yields obtained when the crop was fertilized with either 50kg N/ha or 4.0 Mg hasup>-1 compost.Key words: Compost, N fertilizer, okra, fruit yield and dry matter

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported highest fresh fruit yield was 11.46 Mg hasup>-1.

Outcome
fresh fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11.46 Mg hasup>-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gave the highest fresh fruit yield value of 11.46 Mg hasup>-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of 11.46 Mg hasup>-1 did not differ significantly from yield under 50kg N/ha.

Treatment
50kg N/hae0
Outcome
fruit yieldse0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Value
11.41e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“not significantly different from 11.41 and 11.44 Mg ha,sup>-1 fruit yields obtained when the crop was fertilized with either 50kg N/ha or 4.0 Mg hasup>-1 compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield under 4.0 Mg hasup>-1 compost was not significantly different from the highest yield.

Treatment
4.0 Mg hasup>-1 composte0
Outcome
fruit yieldse0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Value
11.44 Mg ha,sup>-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“not significantly different from 11.41 and 11.44 Mg ha,sup>-1 fruit yields obtained when the crop was fertilized with either 50kg N/ha or 4.0 Mg hasup>-1 compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ

82 papers: 79 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 355 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.