Abstract
Dry matter yield of okra with cocoa pod husk-based (CPH) compost was assessed in a pot experiment. Three CPH-based composts: CPH+Neem leaf (CPH+NL), CPH+Poultry manure (CPH+PM) and CPH+PM+NL at the rate of 25, 50, 75, 100 kg N ha-1 each and NPK fertilizer at 40, 50, 60 kg N ha-1 and control, were applied to 5 kg soil each with three replicates and arranged in a completely randomized design. Two varieties of okra (NH47-4 and LD88) were grown. Plant height, stem girth and number of leaves were measured at 6 weeks after sowing while dry matter yield (DMY) and nutrient uptake were determined. Pre- and post- cropping soil analyses were done. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and means separated by DMRT at α = 0.05. DMY for NH47-4 ranged from 6.5g (control) to 16.7g (NPK 60 kg N ha-1) and from 5.1g (control) to 7.5g (CPH+NL 100 kg N ha-1) while LD88 ranged from 8.3 g (control) to 19.1g (CPH+PM 75 kg N ha-1) and 4.0g (control) to 9.6g (CPH+PM75 kgNha-1 ) in main and residual planting respectively. The N, P and K uptake of NH47-4 and LD88 were significantly enhanced with fertilizer treatments compared to the control. After the residual planting, pH of soil ranged from 6.2 (control) to 7.0 (CPH+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4 and 6.3 (control) to 6.9 (CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with LD88. Organic carbon ranged from 9.7 gkg-1 (control) to 22.7 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4 and 13.9 gkg-1 (control) to 20.3 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with LD88. Total N ranged from 0.1 gkg-1 (control) to 0.8 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 100 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4 and 0.1 gkg-1 (control) to 0.7 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 75 kg N ha-1) with LD88. The P, Ca, Mg and Na were significantly increased with fertilizer compared to control. It could therefore be concluded that CPH-based compost could be a good fertilizer for okra growth and soil fertility improvement.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
NH47-4 main planting dry matter yield reached 16.7g with NPK 60 kg N ha-1 versus 6.5g in control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Material
- NH47-4e0
- Treatment
- NPK 60 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- DMYe0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 16.7ge0
- Qualifier
- 6.5ge0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“DMY for NH47-4 ranged from 6.5g (control) to 16.7g (NPK 60 kg N ha-1)”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
NH47-4 residual planting dry matter yield reached 7.5g with CPH+NL 100 kg N ha-1 versus 5.1g in control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Material
- NH47-4e1
- Treatment
- CPH+NL 100 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- DMYe1
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 7.5ge0
- Qualifier
- 5.1ge0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“from 5.1g (control) to 7.5g (CPH+NL 100 kg N ha-1)”
t0“Dry matter yield of okra”
e1“DMY for NH47-4 ranged from 6.5g (control) to 16.7g (NPK 60 kg N ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
LD88 main planting dry matter yield reached 19.1g with CPH+PM 75 kg N ha-1 versus 8.3 g in control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Material
- LD88e0
- Treatment
- CPH+PM 75 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- DMYe1
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 19.1ge0
- Qualifier
- 8.3 ge0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“LD88 ranged from 8.3 g (control) to 19.1g (CPH+PM 75 kg N ha-1)”
t0“Dry matter yield of okra”
e1“DMY for NH47-4 ranged from 6.5g (control) to 16.7g (NPK 60 kg N ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
LD88 residual planting dry matter yield reached 9.6g with CPH+PM75 kgNha-1 versus 4.0g in control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Material
- LD88e2
- Treatment
- CPH+PM75 kgNha-1e0
- Outcome
- DMYe1
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 9.6ge0
- Qualifier
- 4.0ge0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“4.0g (control) to 9.6g (CPH+PM75 kgNha-1 ) in main and residual planting respectively”
t0“Dry matter yield of okra”
e1“DMY for NH47-4 ranged from 6.5g (control) to 16.7g (NPK 60 kg N ha-1)”
e2“LD88 ranged from 8.3 g (control) to 19.1g (CPH+PM 75 kg N ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizers significantly increased N, P and K uptake in NH47-4 and LD88.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Material
- NH47-4 and LD88e0
- Treatment
- fertilizer treatmentse0
- Outcome
- N, P and K uptakee0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The N, P and K uptake of NH47-4 and LD88 were significantly enhanced with fertilizer treatments compared to the control.”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual soil pH with NH47-4 reached 7.0 under CPH+NL 50 kg N ha-1 versus 6.2 in control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Material
- NH47-4e0
- Treatment
- CPH+NL 50 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- pH of soile0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 7.0e0
- Qualifier
- 6.2e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“pH of soil ranged from 6.2 (control) to 7.0 (CPH+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual soil pH with LD88 reached 6.9 under CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1 versus 6.3 in control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Material
- LD88e0
- Treatment
- CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- pH of soile1
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 6.9e0
- Qualifier
- 6.3e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“6.3 (control) to 6.9 (CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with LD88”
t0“Dry matter yield of okra”
e1“pH of soil ranged from 6.2 (control) to 7.0 (CPH+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual soil organic carbon with NH47-4 reached 22.7 gkg-1 under CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1 versus 9.7 gkg-1 in control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Material
- NH47-4e0
- Treatment
- CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- Organic carbone0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 22.7 gkg-1e0
- Qualifier
- 9.7 gkg-1e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Organic carbon ranged from 9.7 gkg-1 (control) to 22.7 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual soil organic carbon with LD88 reached 20.3 gkg-1 under CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1 versus 13.9 gkg-1 in control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Material
- LD88e0
- Treatment
- CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- Organic carbone1
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 20.3 gkg-1e0
- Qualifier
- 13.9 gkg-1e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“13.9 gkg-1 (control) to 20.3 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with LD88”
t0“Dry matter yield of okra”
e1“Organic carbon ranged from 9.7 gkg-1 (control) to 22.7 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual soil total N with NH47-4 reached 0.8 gkg-1 under CPH+PM+NL 100 kg N ha-1 versus 0.1 gkg-1 in control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Material
- NH47-4e0
- Treatment
- CPH+PM+NL 100 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- Total Ne0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 0.8 gkg-1e0
- Qualifier
- 0.1 gkg-1e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Total N ranged from 0.1 gkg-1 (control) to 0.8 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 100 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual soil total N with LD88 reached 0.7 gkg-1 under CPH+PM+NL 75 kg N ha-1 versus 0.1 gkg-1 in control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Material
- LD88e0
- Treatment
- CPH+PM+NL 75 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- Total Ne1
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 0.7 gkg-1e0
- Qualifier
- 0.1 gkg-1e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“0.1 gkg-1 (control) to 0.7 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 75 kg N ha-1) with LD88”
t0“Dry matter yield of okra”
e1“Total N ranged from 0.1 gkg-1 (control) to 0.8 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 100 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer significantly increased soil P, Ca, Mg and Na versus control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- fertilizere0
- Outcome
- P, Ca, Mg and Nae0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The P, Ca, Mg and Na were significantly increased with fertilizer compared to control.”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that CPH-based compost is useful for okra growth and soil fertility.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- CPH-based composte0
- Outcome
- okra growth and soil fertility improvemente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“CPH-based compost could be a good fertilizer for okra growth and soil fertility improvement”
The same questions in other papers
Theobroma cacao · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
nitrogen · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ
78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
78 papers more in this group
See all 82 papers →nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
63 papers more in this group
See all 67 papers →fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- negative
369 papers more in this group
See all 373 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
16 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.