Paper · 2020 · EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE (EJSS)

Dry matter yield of okra and Nutrient Dynamics with cocoa pod husk-based compost and NPK fertilizer in an Ultisol

Christianah Olubunmi KAYODE; Gideon Olajiire ADEOYE

13
claims
32
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Dry matter yield of okra with cocoa pod husk-based (CPH) compost was assessed in a pot experiment. Three CPH-based composts: CPH+Neem leaf (CPH+NL), CPH+Poultry manure (CPH+PM) and CPH+PM+NL at the rate of 25, 50, 75, 100 kg N ha-1 each and NPK fertilizer at 40, 50, 60 kg N ha-1 and control, were applied to 5 kg soil each with three replicates and arranged in a completely randomized design. Two varieties of okra (NH47-4 and LD88) were grown. Plant height, stem girth and number of leaves were measured at 6 weeks after sowing while dry matter yield (DMY) and nutrient uptake were determined. Pre- and post- cropping soil analyses were done. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and means separated by DMRT at α = 0.05. DMY for NH47-4 ranged from 6.5g (control) to 16.7g (NPK 60 kg N ha-1) and from 5.1g (control) to 7.5g (CPH+NL 100 kg N ha-1) while LD88 ranged from 8.3 g (control) to 19.1g (CPH+PM 75 kg N ha-1) and 4.0g (control) to 9.6g (CPH+PM75 kgNha-1 ) in main and residual planting respectively. The N, P and K uptake of NH47-4 and LD88 were significantly enhanced with fertilizer treatments compared to the control. After the residual planting, pH of soil ranged from 6.2 (control) to 7.0 (CPH+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4 and 6.3 (control) to 6.9 (CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with LD88. Organic carbon ranged from 9.7 gkg-1 (control) to 22.7 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4 and 13.9 gkg-1 (control) to 20.3 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with LD88. Total N ranged from 0.1 gkg-1 (control) to 0.8 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 100 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4 and 0.1 gkg-1 (control) to 0.7 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 75 kg N ha-1) with LD88. The P, Ca, Mg and Na were significantly increased with fertilizer compared to control. It could therefore be concluded that CPH-based compost could be a good fertilizer for okra growth and soil fertility improvement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NH47-4 main planting dry matter yield reached 16.7g with NPK 60 kg N ha-1 versus 6.5g in control.

Material
NH47-4e0
Treatment
NPK 60 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
DMYe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
16.7ge0
Qualifier
6.5ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DMY for NH47-4 ranged from 6.5g (control) to 16.7g (NPK 60 kg N ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NH47-4 residual planting dry matter yield reached 7.5g with CPH+NL 100 kg N ha-1 versus 5.1g in control.

Material
NH47-4e1
Treatment
CPH+NL 100 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
DMYe1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
7.5ge0
Qualifier
5.1ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“from 5.1g (control) to 7.5g (CPH+NL 100 kg N ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry matter yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“DMY for NH47-4 ranged from 6.5g (control) to 16.7g (NPK 60 kg N ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LD88 main planting dry matter yield reached 19.1g with CPH+PM 75 kg N ha-1 versus 8.3 g in control.

Material
LD88e0
Treatment
CPH+PM 75 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
DMYe1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
19.1ge0
Qualifier
8.3 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LD88 ranged from 8.3 g (control) to 19.1g (CPH+PM 75 kg N ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry matter yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“DMY for NH47-4 ranged from 6.5g (control) to 16.7g (NPK 60 kg N ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LD88 residual planting dry matter yield reached 9.6g with CPH+PM75 kgNha-1 versus 4.0g in control.

Material
LD88e2
Treatment
CPH+PM75 kgNha-1e0
Outcome
DMYe1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
9.6ge0
Qualifier
4.0ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4.0g (control) to 9.6g (CPH+PM75 kgNha-1 ) in main and residual planting respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry matter yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“DMY for NH47-4 ranged from 6.5g (control) to 16.7g (NPK 60 kg N ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–786 · show in text ↑
e2

“LD88 ranged from 8.3 g (control) to 19.1g (CPH+PM 75 kg N ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers significantly increased N, P and K uptake in NH47-4 and LD88.

Material
NH47-4 and LD88e0
Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
N, P and K uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N, P and K uptake of NH47-4 and LD88 were significantly enhanced with fertilizer treatments compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil pH with NH47-4 reached 7.0 under CPH+NL 50 kg N ha-1 versus 6.2 in control.

Material
NH47-4e0
Treatment
CPH+NL 50 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
pH of soile0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
7.0e0
Qualifier
6.2e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pH of soil ranged from 6.2 (control) to 7.0 (CPH+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil pH with LD88 reached 6.9 under CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1 versus 6.3 in control.

Material
LD88e0
Treatment
CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
pH of soile1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
6.9e0
Qualifier
6.3e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“6.3 (control) to 6.9 (CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with LD88”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry matter yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“pH of soil ranged from 6.2 (control) to 7.0 (CPH+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil organic carbon with NH47-4 reached 22.7 gkg-1 under CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1 versus 9.7 gkg-1 in control.

Material
NH47-4e0
Treatment
CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
Organic carbone0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
22.7 gkg-1e0
Qualifier
9.7 gkg-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic carbon ranged from 9.7 gkg-1 (control) to 22.7 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil organic carbon with LD88 reached 20.3 gkg-1 under CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1 versus 13.9 gkg-1 in control.

Material
LD88e0
Treatment
CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
Organic carbone1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
20.3 gkg-1e0
Qualifier
13.9 gkg-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13.9 gkg-1 (control) to 20.3 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with LD88”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry matter yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“Organic carbon ranged from 9.7 gkg-1 (control) to 22.7 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 50 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil total N with NH47-4 reached 0.8 gkg-1 under CPH+PM+NL 100 kg N ha-1 versus 0.1 gkg-1 in control.

Material
NH47-4e0
Treatment
CPH+PM+NL 100 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
Total Ne0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
0.8 gkg-1e0
Qualifier
0.1 gkg-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total N ranged from 0.1 gkg-1 (control) to 0.8 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 100 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil total N with LD88 reached 0.7 gkg-1 under CPH+PM+NL 75 kg N ha-1 versus 0.1 gkg-1 in control.

Material
LD88e0
Treatment
CPH+PM+NL 75 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
Total Ne1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
0.7 gkg-1e0
Qualifier
0.1 gkg-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.1 gkg-1 (control) to 0.7 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 75 kg N ha-1) with LD88”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1627 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry matter yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total N ranged from 0.1 gkg-1 (control) to 0.8 gkg-1 (CPH+PM+NL 100 kg N ha-1) with NH47-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer significantly increased soil P, Ca, Mg and Na versus control.

Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
P, Ca, Mg and Nae0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The P, Ca, Mg and Na were significantly increased with fertilizer compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1715 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that CPH-based compost is useful for okra growth and soil fertility.

Treatment
CPH-based composte0
Outcome
okra growth and soil fertility improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CPH-based compost could be a good fertilizer for okra growth and soil fertility improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1753–1844 · show in text ↑

Theobroma cacao · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ

82 papers: 79 positive, 3 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 62 positive, 5 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.