Paper · 2018 · Journal of Plant Production

Okra Plants Response to Farmyard Manure, Mineral and some Bio-Fertilizers

Samar Doklega

11
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried at the Experimental Station Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Egypt, during 2014 and 2015 seasons to evaluate impact of Farmyard manure (Without – FYM), mineral (100%, 75% and 50% NPK of recommended doses), bio-fertilizers (Without – Yeast - Seaweed - EM) and their interactions on chemical components, quality and yield of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) cv. White velvet. Data obtained in this study cleared that, fertilizing okra plants with FYM (organic treatments) at rate of 20m3/fed increased significantly all measured parameters, i.e. chlorophyll a, b and total, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium percentages in leaves, crude protein %, total carbohydrates %, crude fibers %, vitamin C, beta carotene, nitrate concentration and total yield/fed compared with control treatment (without) except crude fiber in the second season. However, fertilizing okra plants with 75% NPK from recommended doses gave the highest values of all studied parameters in the first season except nitrate and yield. Meanwhile, the superiority of all parameters mentioned previously in the second season was obtained from 100% NPK treatment except chlorophylls content. Moreover, treated plants with bio-fertilizers increased significantly all studied characters compared with untreated plants, except nitrate content. The interaction treatment among FYM at the rate of 20 m3/fed, 75% NPK from recommended doses and EM (2ml/l) addition gave the highest values of quality and yield with significant differences in both seasons of study. Therefore, this treatment could be recommended for improving okra production and decrease the amount of mineral fertilizer under similar circumstances of this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure at 20 m3/fed significantly increased chlorophyll a, b and total in okra compared with the control.

Treatment
FYM (organic treatments) at rate of 20m3/fede0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and totale0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatment (without)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizing okra plants with FYM (organic treatments) at rate of 20m3/fed increased significantly all measured parameters, i.e. chlorophyll a, b and total, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium percentages in leaves, crude protein %, total carbohydrates %, crude fibers %, vitamin C, beta carotene, nitrate concentration and total yield/fed compared with control treatment (without) except crude fiber in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure significantly increased nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium percentages in okra leaves compared with the control.

Treatment
FYM (organic treatments) at rate of 20m3/fede0
Outcome
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium percentages in leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatment (without)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizing okra plants with FYM (organic treatments) at rate of 20m3/fed increased significantly all measured parameters, i.e. chlorophyll a, b and total, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium percentages in leaves, crude protein %, total carbohydrates %, crude fibers %, vitamin C, beta carotene, nitrate concentration and total yield/fed compared with control treatment (without) except crude fiber in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure significantly increased crude protein, total carbohydrates and crude fibers in okra compared with the control, except crude fiber in the second season.

Treatment
FYM (organic treatments) at rate of 20m3/fede0
Outcome
crude protein %, total carbohydrates %, crude fibers %e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except crude fiber in the second seasone0
Comparator
control treatment (without)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizing okra plants with FYM (organic treatments) at rate of 20m3/fed increased significantly all measured parameters, i.e. chlorophyll a, b and total, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium percentages in leaves, crude protein %, total carbohydrates %, crude fibers %, vitamin C, beta carotene, nitrate concentration and total yield/fed compared with control treatment (without) except crude fiber in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure significantly increased vitamin C and beta carotene in okra compared with the control.

Treatment
FYM (organic treatments) at rate of 20m3/fede0
Outcome
vitamin C, beta carotenee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatment (without)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizing okra plants with FYM (organic treatments) at rate of 20m3/fed increased significantly all measured parameters, i.e. chlorophyll a, b and total, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium percentages in leaves, crude protein %, total carbohydrates %, crude fibers %, vitamin C, beta carotene, nitrate concentration and total yield/fed compared with control treatment (without) except crude fiber in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure significantly increased nitrate concentration in okra compared with the control.

Treatment
FYM (organic treatments) at rate of 20m3/fede0
Outcome
nitrate concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatment (without)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizing okra plants with FYM (organic treatments) at rate of 20m3/fed increased significantly all measured parameters, i.e. chlorophyll a, b and total, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium percentages in leaves, crude protein %, total carbohydrates %, crude fibers %, vitamin C, beta carotene, nitrate concentration and total yield/fed compared with control treatment (without) except crude fiber in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure significantly increased total okra yield per feddan compared with the control.

Treatment
FYM (organic treatments) at rate of 20m3/fede0
Outcome
total yield/fede0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatment (without)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizing okra plants with FYM (organic treatments) at rate of 20m3/fed increased significantly all measured parameters, i.e. chlorophyll a, b and total, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium percentages in leaves, crude protein %, total carbohydrates %, crude fibers %, vitamin C, beta carotene, nitrate concentration and total yield/fed compared with control treatment (without) except crude fiber in the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first season 75% of the recommended NPK gave the highest values of all studied parameters in okra except nitrate and yield.

Treatment
75% NPK from recommended dosese0
Outcome
highest values of all studied parameterse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
in the first season except nitrate and yielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizing okra plants with 75% NPK from recommended doses gave the highest values of all studied parameters in the first season except nitrate and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second season 100% NPK gave the superiority of all parameters in okra except chlorophylls content.

Treatment
100% NPKe0
Outcome
superiority of all parameterse0
Direction
superioritye0
Qualifier
except chlorophylls contente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the superiority of all parameters mentioned previously in the second season was obtained from 100% NPK treatment except chlorophylls content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra plants treated with bio-fertilizers significantly increased all studied characters compared with untreated plants, except nitrate content.

Treatment
bio-fertilizerse0
Outcome
all studied characterse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except nitrate contente0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treated plants with bio-fertilizers increased significantly all studied characters compared with untreated plants, except nitrate content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of FYM at 20 m3/fed, 75% NPK and EM at 2 ml/l gave the highest quality and yield values in okra, with significant differences in both seasons.

Treatment
FYM at the rate of 20 m3/fed, 75% NPK from recommended doses and EM (2ml/l) additione0
Outcome
highest values of quality and yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction treatment among FYM at the rate of 20 m3/fed, 75% NPK from recommended doses and EM (2ml/l) addition gave the highest values of quality and yield with significant differences in both seasons of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1572 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the FYM + 75% NPK + EM treatment for improving okra production and reducing the mineral fertilizer amount under similar circumstances.

Outcome
improving okra production and decrease the amount of mineral fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment could be recommended for improving okra production and decrease the amount of mineral fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1696 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 62 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.