Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology

Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens for Biocontrol of Bacterial Wilt of Tomato Incited by Ralstonia solanacearum

Dinesh Singh; Dhananjay Kumar Yadav

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
65
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Fifty seven rhizobacteria were isolated from rhizospheric soil of wilted tomato plants and among them two strains of rhizobacteria, having better antagonistic and plant growth promoting ability were characterized them as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DSBA-11 and DSBA-12 based on morphological, biochemical, partial gene sequence analysis of 16S rRNA and fatty acid methyl ester analysis. Antagonistic activity of these strains DSBA-11, DSBA-12 was compared with other Bacillus species such as B. subtilis DTBS-5, B. cereus JHTBS-7, B. pumilus MTCC-7092 strains, against Ralstonia solanacearum race 1, bv 3, phylotype I, inciting bacterial wilt of tomato underin vitro conditions. B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-11 showed maximum growth inhibition of R. solanacearum (4.91cm 2 ) followed by strains DSBA-12 (3.31cm 2 ) and B. subtilis (3.07 cm 2 ). Moreover, strains DSBA-11 was also have better phosphorus solubilizing ability (42.6 g/ml) and indole acetic acid (95.4 g/ml) production than other strains of Bacillus spp. in vitro conditions. Biocontrol efficacy and plant growth ability of these bacterial antagonists was tested against bacterial wilt of tomato cv. Pusa Ruby under glasshouse conditions. Minimum bacterial wilt disease incidenceincultivar Pusa Ruby (17.95%) was recorded in B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-11followed by B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-12 after 30 days of inoculation.The bio-control efficacy was higher in B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA -12 treated plants, followed by B. pumilus MTCC-7092.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSBA-11 showed maximum in vitro inhibition of R. solanacearum.

Material
DSBA-11e0
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
growth inhibition of R. solanacearume0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.91cm 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-11 showed maximum growth inhibition of R. solanacearum (4.91cm 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Incited by Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSBA-12 produced 3.31cm 2 inhibition of R. solanacearum.

Material
DSBA-12e0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
followed bye0
Value
3.31cm 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by strains DSBA-12 (3.31cm 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Incited by Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis produced 3.07 cm 2 inhibition.

Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearumt0pathogen
Outcome
B. subtilise0
Value
3.07 cm 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis (3.07 cm 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Incited by Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSBA-11 had greater phosphorus solubilization than other Bacillus strains.

Material
DSBA-11e0
Outcome
phosphorus solubilizing abilitye0
Direction
bettere0
Value
42.6 g/mle0
Comparator
other strains of Bacillus spp.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strains DSBA-11 was also have better phosphorus solubilizing ability (42.6 g/ml) and indole acetic acid (95.4 g/ml) production than other strains of Bacillus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Incited by Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSBA-11 had greater indole acetic acid production than other Bacillus strains.

Material
DSBA-11e0
Outcome
indole acetic acide0
Direction
bettere0
Value
95.4 g/mle0
Comparator
other strains of Bacillus spp.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strains DSBA-11 was also have better phosphorus solubilizing ability (42.6 g/ml) and indole acetic acid (95.4 g/ml) production than other strains of Bacillus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Incited by Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSBA-11 treatment had minimum bacterial wilt incidence in Pusa Ruby after 30 days.

Material
Pusa Rubye0
Treatment
B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-11e0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearumt0pathogen
Second interactor
B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-11Bacillus amyloliquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
bacterial wilt disease incidencee0
Direction
Minimume0
Value
17.95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum bacterial wilt disease incidenceincultivar Pusa Ruby (17.95%) was recorded in B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-11followed by B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-12 after 30 days of inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Incited by Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSBA-12 ranked after DSBA-11 for minimum bacterial wilt incidence.

Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearumt0pathogen
Second interactor
B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-12Bacillus amyloliquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
followed by B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-12e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-11followed by B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA-12 after 30 days of inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Incited by Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSBA-12 treated plants had higher biocontrol efficacy, followed by B. pumilus.

Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearumt0pathogen
Second interactor
B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA -12Bacillus amyloliquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
bio-control efficacye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bio-control efficacy was higher in B. amyloliquefaciens DSBA -12 treated plants, followed by B. pumilus MTCC-7092.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Incited by Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–116 · show in text ↑

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.