Abstract
To study the effects of planting date and plant density on Amaranth, two field experiments were conducted in 2013 at Marv-Dasht, Fars, Iran. The field experiments were conducted as split plot in a randomized complete block design with 3 replications. Plant density (6.6, 8.3 and 11.0 Plant.m -2 ) and planting date (June 22 ed , July 6 th and July 21 st ) were used as treatments. Results of this study revealed that the planting date and plant density had significant effect on number of leaf per plant, stem diameter, leaf dry weigh, stem dry weight, forage yield, relative growth rate (RGR), crop growth rate (CGR) and leaf area index (LAI). Highest amaranth forage yield (11.7t.ha -1 ) was obtained from 6.6 plant.m -2 density and July 6 th planting date. Moreover, in the experiment condition the amaranth yield was also reduced with delay in planting date from 6 th to 21 st July and increases the plant density from 6.6 to 11 plant .m -2 significantly.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Planting date and plant density had significant effects on number of leaves per plant, stem diameter and leaf dry weight of amaranth.
- Taxon
- Amaranthus hypochondriacus
Amaranthus hypochondriacust0 - Treatment
- planting date and plant densitye1
- Outcome
- number of leaf per plant, stem diameter, leaf dry weighe1
- Setting
- Marv-Dasht, Fars, Irane2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Amaranthus hypochondriacus l.”
e1“the planting date and plant density had significant effect on number of leaf per plant, stem diameter, leaf dry weigh, stem dry weight, forage yield, relative growth rate (RGR), crop growth rate (CGR) and leaf area index (LAI)”
e2“two field experiments were conducted in 2013 at Marv-Dasht, Fars, Iran”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting date and plant density had significant effects on stem dry weight and forage yield of amaranth.
- Taxon
- Amaranthus hypochondriacusAmaranthus hypochondriacust0
- Treatment
- planting date and plant densitye1
- Outcome
- stem dry weight, forage yielde1
- Setting
- Marv-Dasht, Fars, Irane2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Amaranthus hypochondriacus l.”
e1“the planting date and plant density had significant effect on number of leaf per plant, stem diameter, leaf dry weigh, stem dry weight, forage yield, relative growth rate (RGR), crop growth rate (CGR) and leaf area index (LAI)”
e2“two field experiments were conducted in 2013 at Marv-Dasht, Fars, Iran”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting date and plant density had significant effects on relative growth rate, crop growth rate and leaf area index of amaranth.
- Taxon
- Amaranthus hypochondriacusAmaranthus hypochondriacust0
- Treatment
- planting date and plant densitye1
- Outcome
- relative growth rate (RGR), crop growth rate (CGR) and leaf area index (LAI)e1
- Setting
- Marv-Dasht, Fars, Irane2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Amaranthus hypochondriacus l.”
e1“the planting date and plant density had significant effect on number of leaf per plant, stem diameter, leaf dry weigh, stem dry weight, forage yield, relative growth rate (RGR), crop growth rate (CGR) and leaf area index (LAI)”
e2“two field experiments were conducted in 2013 at Marv-Dasht, Fars, Iran”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest forage yield, 11.7 t/ha, was obtained at 6.6 plants per m2 with a July 6 planting date.
- Taxon
- Amaranthus hypochondriacusAmaranthus hypochondriacust0
- Treatment
- 6.6 plant.m -2 density and July 6 th planting datee3
- Outcome
- forage yielde3
- Direction
- Higheste3
- Value
- 11.7t.ha -1e3
- Setting
- Marv-Dasht, Fars, Irane2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Amaranthus hypochondriacus l.”
e2“two field experiments were conducted in 2013 at Marv-Dasht, Fars, Iran”
e3“Highest amaranth forage yield (11.7t.ha -1 ) was obtained from 6.6 plant.m -2 density and July 6 th planting date”
Claim · model-written summary
Delaying planting from 6 to 21 July reduced amaranth yield.
- Taxon
- Amaranthus hypochondriacusAmaranthus hypochondriacust0
- Treatment
- delay in planting date from 6 th to 21 st Julye4
- Outcome
- amaranth yielde4
- Direction
- reducede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Amaranthus hypochondriacus l.”
e4“the amaranth yield was also reduced with delay in planting date from 6 th to 21 st July”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing plant density from 6.6 to 11 plants per m2 significantly reduced amaranth yield.
- Taxon
- Amaranthus hypochondriacusAmaranthus hypochondriacust0
- Treatment
- plant density from 6.6 to 11 plant .m -2e5
- Outcome
- amaranth yielde5
- Direction
- reducede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Amaranthus hypochondriacus l.”
e5“the amaranth yield was also reduced with delay in planting date from 6 th to 21 st July and increases the plant density from 6.6 to 11 plant .m -2 significantly”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · yield · Amaranthus hypochondriacus (grain amaranth)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →density · yield · Amaranthus hypochondriacus (grain amaranth)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.