Paper · 2016 · Crop and Pasture Science

Nitrogen rate and timing effects on growth and yield of drill-sown rice

B. W. Dunn; T. S. Dunn; B. A. Orchard

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
28
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Eight rice experiments were established at two sites in the Riverina district of south-eastern Australia in the 2012–13 and 2013–14 seasons. Two semi-dwarf rice varieties were drill-sown and nitrogen (N) fertiliser (urea) was applied at different rates at the 4-leaf stage before permanent water (pre-PW) and at panicle initiation (PI). The research assessed the impact of timing of N application on grain yield, compared the apparent N recovery of N fertiliser applied at the two stages, and determined an application strategy for N to obtain consistently high grain yields for current, semi-dwarf rice varieties when drill-sown. The apparent N recoveries achieved were 59% for N applied pre-PW and 25% for N applied at PI, averaged across years, sites, varieties and N rates. Grain yield increased significantly with increased rate of N applied at both stages, but the rate of increase from N applied at PI decreased as the rate of N applied pre-PW increased. The grain yield increase for N applied pre-PW was due to increased number of panicles at maturity and increased number of florets per panicle. Nitrogen applied at PI increased dry matter at maturity and number of florets per panicle. Application of N at PI increased grain yield over that when no N was applied; however, at low PI N-uptake levels, application of N at PI is not enough to achieve high grain yields. Therefore, sufficient N should be available to the crop from a combination of soil- and pre-PW-applied N for the crop to reach a level of N uptake at PI whereby high yields can be achieved. Nitrogen applied at PI did not appear to increase the potential for cold-induced floret sterility as much as pre-PW-applied N. Further research is required to confirm this in other seasons and for other rice varieties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent N recovery was 59% before permanent water.

Treatment
N applied pre-PWe0
Outcome
apparent N recoveriese0
Value
59%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The apparent N recoveries achieved were 59% for N applied pre-PW and 25% for N applied at PI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen rate and timing effects on growth and yield of drill-sown rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent N recovery was 25% at panicle initiation.

Treatment
N applied at PIe0
Outcome
apparent N recoveriese0
Value
25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The apparent N recoveries achieved were 59% for N applied pre-PW and 25% for N applied at PI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen rate and timing effects on growth and yield of drill-sown rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased significantly with greater N rates at both stages.

Treatment
increased rate of N applied at both stagese0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield increased significantly with increased rate of N applied at both stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen rate and timing effects on growth and yield of drill-sown rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield response to PI nitrogen weakened as pre-PW nitrogen rose.

Treatment
N applied at PIe0
Outcome
rate of increasee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
N applied pre-PWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of increase from N applied at PI decreased as the rate of N applied pre-PW increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen rate and timing effects on growth and yield of drill-sown rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-PW nitrogen increased panicle number and florets per panicle.

Treatment
N applied pre-PWe0
Outcome
number of panicles at maturity and increased number of florets per paniclee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield increase for N applied pre-PW was due to increased number of panicles at maturity and increased number of florets per panicle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen rate and timing effects on growth and yield of drill-sown rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PI nitrogen increased dry matter at maturity and florets per panicle.

Treatment
Nitrogen applied at PIe0
Outcome
dry matter at maturity and number of florets per paniclee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen applied at PI increased dry matter at maturity and number of florets per panicle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen rate and timing effects on growth and yield of drill-sown rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PI nitrogen increased grain yield over no nitrogen.

Treatment
Application of N at PIe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
when no N was appliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of N at PI increased grain yield over that when no N was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen rate and timing effects on growth and yield of drill-sown rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low PI nitrogen uptake was insufficient for high yield even with PI nitrogen application.

Outcome
high grain yieldse0
Qualifier
at low PI N-uptake levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at low PI N-uptake levels, application of N at PI is not enough to achieve high grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen rate and timing effects on growth and yield of drill-sown rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PI nitrogen appeared less likely than pre-PW nitrogen to increase cold-induced floret sterility.

Treatment
Nitrogen applied at PIe0
Outcome
potential for cold-induced floret sterilitye0
Direction
did not appear to increasee0
Comparator
pre-PW-applied Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen applied at PI did not appear to increase the potential for cold-induced floret sterility as much as pre-PW-applied N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Nitrogen rate and timing effects on growth and yield of drill-sown rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.