Abstract
Abstract ‘Jubilee’ sweet corn ( Zea mays L.) was grown under conventional tillage, strip tillage, and no-till methods in 1983 with 5 irrigation levels imposed on each tillage treatment. The crop-water production functions for evapotranspiration vs. yield were different in scale but similar in slope for the 3 tillage treatments. At each level of seasonal applied water, the conventional tillage produced significantly higher yields of husked sweet corn than did strip tillage, and strip tillage yields were significantly higher than those of no-till.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
The crop-water production functions for evapotranspiration versus yield differed in scale but were similar in slope among the three tillage treatments.
- Taxon
- Sweet Cornt0
- Treatment
- tillagee0
- Outcome
- crop-water production functionse0
- Qualifier
- different in scale but similar in slopee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“Sweet Corn”
e0“The crop-water production functions for evapotranspiration vs. yield were different in scale but similar in slope for the 3 tillage treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
At each level of seasonal applied water, conventional tillage produced significantly higher yields of husked sweet corn than strip tillage.
Verbatim
t0“Sweet Corn”
e1“At each level of seasonal applied water, the conventional tillage produced significantly higher yields of husked sweet corn than did strip tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Strip tillage yields were significantly higher than no-till yields.
Verbatim
t0“Sweet Corn”
e2“strip tillage yields were significantly higher than those of no-till”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.